Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Tue, 27 September 2011 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F5C21F8E62 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.329
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.329 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.269, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pz3phXbm+akq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s1.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s1.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F01221F8E4D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU152-W29 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s1.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:23:27 -0700
Message-ID: <BLU152-W295A7FCD81C6C902B37A3993F00@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_6dfc72bf-3002-45b1-989e-14e51028f8ac_"
X-Originating-IP: [98.203.198.61]
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: <roman@telurix.com>, <juberti@google.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:23:26 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxsKTHCuBQdUnGQtGfF7NmZZExLe9Q9B9cNR=483neuHPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD5OKxtNjmWBz92bRuxka7e-BUpTPgVUvr3ahJGpmZ-U5nuPbQ@mail.gmail.com>, <CAD6AjGSmz5T_F+SK2EoBQm6T-iRKp7dd4j8ZAF5JKdbbyomZQA@mail.gmail.com>, <CALiegfmO54HC+g9L_DYn4jtXAAbLEvS++qxKa6TNrLDREs9SeA@mail.gmail.com>, <4E80984A.903@skype.net>, <CALiegfmyvTb57WVooKryS-ubfcg+w5gZ+zfO1zzBLn3609AzaA@mail.gmail.com>, <4E809EE6.2050702@skype.net>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F1087@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>, <BLU152-W62B7F2AC3F0D5B6E277CB993F00@phx.gbl>, <CAD5OKxt=P3jg9N0weFUZLvUYQxyeXa+9YMtpc8wn7osuPQmTpg@mail.gmail.com>, <CAD5OKxtVCgiFV_iAYd1w0uZZcS5+gsixOHJ0jGN=0CMdq++kdg@mail.gmail.com>, <CAOJ7v-3PrnNyesL+x-mto9Q9djjiJ13QZHXCiGfY1mv3nubrqQ@mail.gmail.com>, <CAD5OKxsKTHCuBQdUnGQtGfF7NmZZExLe9Q9B9cNR=483neuHPQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2011 15:23:27.0848 (UTC) FILETIME=[67FA2680:01CC7D29]
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:21:06 -0000

I'm not going to use this mailing list as an advertising medium, but there do exist products that support both ICE and SRTP, and some of the companies you name below have deployed those products to *thousands* of their employees. 

Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:12:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
From: roman@telurix.com
To: juberti@google.com
CC: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com; rtcweb@ietf.org

I am sorry, but can you name "robust telephony services" that currently provide ICE and SRTP support in US? AFAK Verizon, Qwest, Level3, Global Crossing, Paetec, XO do not provide this._____________

Roman Shpount