Re: [rtcweb] Review request for RTCWeb standard signaling protocol

Neil Stratford <neils@belltower.co.uk> Wed, 19 October 2011 08:33 UTC

Return-Path: <neils@vipadia.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA1B21F8B71 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.957
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RHuMXwPAF70T for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493CB21F8B6F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iabn5 with SMTP id n5so2017079iab.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.82.131 with SMTP id b3mr2441228ibl.74.1319013222788; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: neils@vipadia.com
Received: by 10.231.199.4 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E9E7F9F.1020503@jesup.org>
References: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F1367@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <665A16AB-AAD8-42B3-AC17-7E629EA2DE35@phonefromhere.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF5115992E@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <CALiegfmrncjsLVSiWk0tEgzwB00YaBGiqj0SDf9JTm9p1ZNoVA@mail.gmail.com> <0950F0E1-6E4B-407F-9563-654AFE79F64B@ag-projects.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159994@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC09804004302@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com> <033458F56EC2A64E8D2D7B759FA3E7E703DBF614@sonusmail04.sonusnet.com> <8486C8728176924BAF5BDB2F7D7EEDDF3E091D13@ucolhp4d.easf.csd.disa.mil> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF511599F3@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <CALiegfnyfrBHATQ3WThT7F_fpXePN8PFYW_MJMwK-6QUjzkknA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMBa7RNzT3y_s+PgHZr9DTz-49WC8aEqmmZLt-eEYkBFnQ@mail.gmail.com> <37796D08-7A24-478B-8157-052FFB2E3945@acmepacket.com> <CA+9kkMATLaKpZzbNQeS8XMbqkViyeY=w6qx4S-txJr5A=D9s=w@mail.gmail.com> <4E9E7F9F.1020503@jesup.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:33:42 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: R477OdPYjIHil-vvlE4q-qzcJVM
Message-ID: <CABRok6=AYsOfLBDzd0ox02VEDyGJyhcNGWr5HsExxU6QvDLJoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Neil Stratford <neils@belltower.co.uk>
To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6b306992fff04afa2b20a
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Review request for RTCWeb standard signaling protocol
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:33:43 -0000

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>wrote:

>
> 1) Don't lock us in to a existing protocol because it blocks doing X
>
>   This doesn't lock anyone in; all can use the ROAP interface directly
>   and ignore this protocol offered by the browser.
>

At this point you are already locked in to a protocol that must fit the ROAP
model, which I see as a problem if you want to build a solutuion that
doesn't look exactly like a traditional RTC system based on SDP o/a.

Neil