IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Wed, 26 October 2011 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47E521F8B04 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.403, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_BACKHAIR_27=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wEE1nQr-cgrZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0F421F8A96 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; l=1592; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1319656470; x=1320866070; h=message-id:date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=B4j5aOiJwI4d/vZB1tJIZ025YenrglbUoncEbWyvToc=; b=jEsbo6+fj5cYJRIW4M3WwlT8H0cCXE5nFTjqK04x0vM1AbvQPHf6E6EN paQVPhwmX/QEHh1LuNZQhjnVeoYWRjgKArQaDgIwtGcQsgNo7MahHO0+P 5Y6aq0dZd/MXqWbQvK8U+N/f/lH0O/T1uP0Cl23yA/CPwQRoBWYCJiId0 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,411,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="10481131"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2011 19:14:30 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com (rcdn-jmpolk-8713.cisco.com [10.99.80.20]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9QJETpn019583; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:14:29 GMT
Message-Id: <201110261914.p9QJETpn019583@mtv-core-3.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:14:27 -0500
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "'James M. Polk'" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233D45FF4@ESESSCMS0356.ee mea.ericsson.se>
References: <AAB480AA-8F03-4C25-8A7C-55B88D057C24@acmepacket.com> <42322A10-14A7-4600-820D-7612A1B12592@cisco.com> <3747C7CB-C039-4D15-A46C-8FDB9A47AF3A@acmepacket.com> <DD0E14D2-252F-442B-9AFC-8ECD6704794B@cisco.com> <201110261756.p9QHuke7006749@mtv-core-1.cisco.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233D45FF4@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:14:30 -0000

At 12:58 PM 10/26/2011, Christer Holmberg wrote:

>Why does Hadriel care - an SBC can always change the terminology ;)

very nice!

>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On 
>Behalf Of James M. Polk
>Sent: 26. lokakuuta 2011 20:57
>To: Hadriel Kaplan
>Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus Call: RTCWeb Terminology
>
>Hadriel
>
>now that you named it, you have to fix it (or otherwise make it work) ...
>
>;-)
>
>James
>
>At 12:17 PM 10/26/2011, Cullen Jennings wrote:
>
> >With my chair hat on ...
> >
> >I'd like to declare we currently have consensus for Hadriel's proposal
> >that the technology should be referred to as "WebRTC" and the API as
> >the "WebRTC API". The IETF WG name is still RTCWeb, the mailing list is
> >still rtcweb@ietf.org, the IETF drafts should still have "-rtcweb-" in
> >them to indicate the WG name.
> >
> >Cullen <RTCWeb CoChair>
> >
> >
> >On Oct 24, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> >
> > > For the API, the consensus was it would be confusing to people if
> > we weren't consistent with W3C docs.
> > >
> > > So I propose the following:
> > >
> > > WebRTC: the whole shebang
> > > WebRTC API: the JS<->Browser API.
> > >
> > > -hadriel
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >rtcweb mailing list
> >rtcweb@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>_______________________________________________
>rtcweb mailing list
>rtcweb@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status