Re: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for IETF 87

inline 

On Jul 11, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> I can see some implied outcomes for some of the items.  Would it help
> to list some (aspirational) goals.
> 
> On 11 July 2013 09:51, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Should SDES be part of  WebRTC security practice and, if so, how?
>> Presentations: 30 minutes
>> Discussion:  40 minutes
> 
> Are the chairs confident that this topic can be resolved in this time?
> We managed to fritter a similar amount of time away without
> conclusion in the past.  I can see how you plan to accommodate
> overruns, but that just opens the possibility more time-wasting.  How
> do we ensure that this discussion actually concludes?

Thought on how to make that happen? Time needed ?

> 
>> Post-Plan A/Plan B MMUSIC discussion of impact to RTCWEB documents
>> Presentation: 30 minutes
> 
> How are you planning to prepare for this?  Do you have presenter
> candidates lined up?

This is a very draft agenda - part of the issues is we are not even at the -00 draft deadline yet so I expect that by next week we should be able to figure out more details. We have scheduled the MMUSIC meetings before the RTCWeb meetings in Berlin so at some level, some of this may change after the MMUSIC meetings happen. Anyways, expect more details after we get to read all the drafts and expect us to be a bit dynamic on this given what happens in the MMUSIC meeting. 

> 
>> Chair Discussion:  10 minutes
> 
> I'm curious how you intend to spend this time.

We would like to inform folks of a few things happening in other WG (TURN, NAT, BEHAVE etc) but we would also like to have a discussion about what it takes to get to "Done" for the first iteration of all this stuff. We need to get WG feedback on what work is left and what needs to be prioritized. 

> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb