Re: [rtcweb] OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-13

[Harald Alvestrand <[e-mail]>]

Den 28. mai 2015 08:32, skrev Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy):
>> > Please add a sentence to summarize ICE-lite, not just the reference.
> NEW:
> ICE-lite agent defined in section 2.7 of [RFC5245] does not generate connectivity
>    checks or runs the ICE state machine, it only needs to be able to
>    respond to connectivity checks.  Hence an ICE-lite implementation
>    will not generate consent checks, but will just respond to consent
>    checks it receives.  No changes are required to ICE-lite
>    implementations in order to respond to consent checks, as they are
>    processed as normal ICE connectivity checks.
> 
>> > 

Grammar stickler:

"An ICE-lite agent, as defined in section 2.7 of [RFC5245], does not
generate connectivity check or run the ICE state machine".

.... "Hence an ICE-lite agent will not ..."

I think the second occurence of "implementation" is OK, but the first
one really needs to be "agent".