IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] My Opinion: Why I think a negotiating protocol is a Good Thing

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Wed, 19 October 2011 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514081F0C4E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.528
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4dSs3GsEaZfB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22831F0C49 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAIL2.acmepacket.com (10.0.0.22) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:15:26 -0400
Received: from MAIL1.acmepacket.com ([169.254.1.230]) by Mail2.acmepacket.com ([169.254.2.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:15:26 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Wolfgang Beck <wolfgang.beck01@googlemail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] My Opinion: Why I think a negotiating protocol is a Good Thing
Thread-Index: AQHMjiZ9U04PtW0ttUmXsgDgKylc8g==
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:15:25 +0000
Message-ID: <A92193B6-5182-4954-A842-A9402286C436@acmepacket.com>
References: <4E9D667A.2040703@alvestrand.no> <CAAJUQMhUh5XiFh8rpg=Xag_F_Vm5tuVE5yRnArxzcd6sXb-=Kw@mail.gmail.com> <4E9DBECC.6000206@alvestrand.no> <CAAJUQMg=njg6SLBnLrQhN8kqyn8Y55Ghmv8YYpzfP6rmUanmBQ@mail.gmail.com> <1DEFCFF8-4F23-4D84-914D-AB50233C8C06@cisco.com> <CAAJUQMjj3sZ6bgR_uaSoTWVsRZZKf9Zjz7MZ6Rfh51PAJkWAow@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAJUQMjj3sZ6bgR_uaSoTWVsRZZKf9Zjz7MZ6Rfh51PAJkWAow@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [216.41.24.34]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9AD7AC711A32794EA42EB79C59EFC5BB@acmepacket.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAWE=
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] My Opinion: Why I think a negotiating protocol is a Good Thing
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:15:28 -0000

On Oct 19, 2011, at 1:21 AM, Wolfgang Beck wrote:

> There is a need that people with an account at provider A can call
> people at provider B. I have several SIP accounts with various
> providers and I don't know for sure which one would be usable for
> communicating with you. It's not like email.
> 
> What I see is SIP providers that use the PSTN for interconnection. 

I think you need to get out more. :)
It's true it's not like email, but provider interconnection with SIP is big business.
Maybe you mean for more than voice calls?  IM and video are not nearly as big for SIP interconnection.

-hadriel

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status