Re: [rtcweb] Call for review

Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com> Wed, 06 March 2019 04:43 UTC

Return-Path: <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6FC130EBE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 20:43:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GKbjq28ml1GG for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 20:43:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 453FB130EB8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 20:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id h8so7314353pgp.6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:43:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=IEXM92oGhg2B6vMyJgnV1gCLD/lGmNr/gUsWOpXW0Sc=; b=O07O0/yryKQNSSB19R/MahkxdI31Fgamf9D8c5zCQEJL/qpdyd8LlLVjctgxm8T5jJ gPLGHlKD86e1RdjOmDNIkETjIS64idCi9A5obR/kfGHIWKWa0d28HxPRy3UsGfpgdjUM bqHy8xGlcCmlahR5kfnKNa5wIcQax9KrLU258=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=IEXM92oGhg2B6vMyJgnV1gCLD/lGmNr/gUsWOpXW0Sc=; b=skslfWgZpyQ62IJdrbnmNFBlMv9acjXQ/m3S5uKxlIv/GZPkw6kSBdlDc2sAMFiLG0 VcZ83oQd7GuguBPPbcTEobHNuTKIi32iq0dMrl7Y6XjnwoNsQbU8FQgIX+qsGDKlendA TUDPuq1zeJGQBmQd7jXodRGfvO0w6b45lOpc1bqYvzC/FRXFFvvOJXPCanFPXrBruAnC CVQgRUQpqj8gU8BR3FOC4zIgECfW/Nm8fxtpVTWFzcevpMwUDAiNt+6ZvpB1osj6f1rH CzrMD7waIKKo+ERNZ2p5lCFMkoz2ZPfXIAaecZwrxg7zZcxhwAesQhiHdeUct2Sxqg9a pwYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVd1RSErwdnUe4cj17ghkdymINo3utb1k8CmVqwEoNeAjVnKLGU 2KsW479zUTY69MrtyduMdCSYuYP7XLQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzYIX5Qoao2eHC30k7X6RxOouaIdQPIg666xWlWvTAAEDkih6MISHyeyHDLWY1/DXt8muA3dQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2a2b:: with SMTP id i40mr3245019plb.236.1551847433089; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:43:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4600:3f31:e07d:f33e:2143:e1f5? ([2601:647:4600:3f31:e07d:f33e:2143:e1f5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h3sm591814pgv.38.2019.03.05.20.43.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:43:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
Message-Id: <17370418-5B43-43E2-A96B-CF03E627BE0F@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_66A3443F-672B-479C-95BE-A848F9D27EFA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 20:43:50 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBEzEFtRyvApTs9p4AvixMFO0Fe-Z+Wk5mh09ZxY_4uOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <CA+9kkMBEzEFtRyvApTs9p4AvixMFO0Fe-Z+Wk5mh09ZxY_4uOQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/6-95zlJ6kt4aRwX0pfBna-fDiAM>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for review
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 04:43:59 -0000

I have reviewed draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-mdns and in general it looks.

One part is not clear enough to me though: 
- section 3.1 uses the term “preferred interface” for first time (I did not find this term in draft-rtcweb-ip-handling) and it’s not clear to me what it means.
- section 3.2 does not use the term interfaces at all, but instead talks about IP addresses instead.

I’m guessing section 3.2 implicitly refers to all IP addresses from all interface. It would help to make that explicit.
Since “preferred interface” seems to be used first in the draft I think needs to be defined somewhere.
Alternatively the term “preferred interface” in section 3.1 could get replaced with terms referring to IP addresses.

Best regards
  Nils Ohlmeier

> On 5Mar, 2019, at 12:22, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> Howdy,
> 
> draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex- <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-mdns/>mdns <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-mdns/> is a very short draft describing two new modes  related to draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling> using bits of draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates/>;.
> 
> The chairs would like to ask for a couple of reviews; given that it is four pages long, we are hopeful that it will not take much time.
> 
> Please send your review to the list,
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Ted
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb