Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb-transports reference to TRAM discovery

On 12/17/2014 05:19 PM, Hutton, Andrew wrote:
> OP: 15 December 2014 22:44 Justin Uberti Wrote:
>> I think making it a requirement is probably premature until we have a
>> WG document that explains what should happen when you discover one of
>> these network-provided TURN servers.
>> Once https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return-04 is
>> accepted as a WG doc, we can add a requirement for support for RETURN
>> and server discovery.
>>
>> Unclear whether it needs to be MUST-strength until we get some
>> implementation feedback though.
>>
> -transports already states " WebRTC browsers MUST support configuration of STUN and TURN servers, both from browser configuration and from an application".
>
> So it looks like we already have a requirement but no explanation of what should happen when both are available.

The last times we've talked about this, people have imagined configuring 
this via the same mechanism as configuring HTTP proxies (nonstandard 
script at a nonstandard URL).

Autodiscovery may be preferable, but it's not clear that it removes the 
need for the script-like things.

>
> Looks like we need to adopt draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return and explain this stuff. I would certainly support that and put some effort into getting this done.
>
> Andy
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb