Re: [rtcweb] Transports: RFC 6062 support

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Wed, 12 March 2014 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2241A087C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.925
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.925 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KFuPjtz-z6f3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-x234.google.com (mail-ve0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BA51A08AD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f180.google.com with SMTP id jz11so9111984veb.25 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=jNgmrHGluNLdEsWmY6Jv5EIjZeQWk+e4aXshqqf/WO4=; b=Vd//iaHVC/SKgMMBDzAzsUD+9iDO3hIH4bllinWh8eDt9+nNHy1YIRyLUrBX3QPVyC vIeuHLTJGbh4sr6H2gdexe++hSQgLDVLkDSk2GiR2du+JaLli8T6TiR+mHINLHkNnVpe vMmD2HvUv9A2gCyqfJx+yzY2tzCZ7nU2NTyjorAnevnT8sllOmgwpmXdPoDLXVhICoBY CDg4YH0p4JNsPu1oezRebCj4mUCpQF9NN9duaAmnOw310jzUrVA8SfMwHvvIifqQ1GnT y1uyX1TkKl+tEwC2vGPUsZzgmb6igFO/PDrbDf1kVOuSu9veuswOMliX7RbsA8zmVimu ePOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=jNgmrHGluNLdEsWmY6Jv5EIjZeQWk+e4aXshqqf/WO4=; b=eTbkTnWKUIAWLN5MhK95ZPu6kyLRxk8YhR3EyRr6jswxlCiiMU4CXv2/tU5/rguWkP GQ6VNtvSXOShNQCz3t6swfPHLVrsM1LIXWZaC9DgzIOxPbWtCr6she4jBbJWuTyB+raG BQo73aVV7QqpdXNfPK368pAmxsnPZhFQEghWAtTIRblkgin/AcfSHRXHW56uu8461//t jKHVdW15F72oQ0Ovg2KkG28CNyi1QpmCPRitpqiGjNmMMZq53LPLACPEpbbnWYtQU0yU fsBA955OlUYe5KXfHpYO55Y/bip+kEcJ2HuaJC1fOzTeSJ2TNN3DYQlaq3TTw5PAq90V i3Wg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQli2/b3EldTeP6uAB6S9vXGfya7iHF5d8PI1+t/gCqRKokU+0SCHBLQGSxaCqYsSfrUsYDNjNEBzF1b0Bku3n9rvhk8yhIgNAeBsa2WlqCqpV5B4aL5WD8u9Yf7wQtcGW/IyaUl+2m2tICLdfYMC3rNrKtGgHNyH+QyposBMD5sQIZpbJGHJh8lkVyk5MG5QS4jBOo2
X-Received: by 10.52.251.199 with SMTP id zm7mr20481881vdc.21.1394585947308; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.26.43 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <531DDB5A.4060201@ericsson.com>
References: <CAOJ7v-0-U8ycUYcOwRGxgZVDQmdPMXC4Qt7F+uAn29AGOepX7w@mail.gmail.com> <CABAmMA00xA1TbXsQRYYnuukYyurZzdG8nKr95aT4gxHxQtNiMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0xiG-omwmpXm9koakab+EDFo7W=gW+WY4fGS6QVKfALQ@mail.gmail.com> <4A409D06-511D-424D-8285-E38B3E08292D@skype.net> <53177A5E.7030704@viagenie.ca> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A4844FABAB0B@TK5EX14MBXC296.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <53183BBB.3040409@viagenie.ca> <CAOJ7v-1ZN=N5w3hFRkrC+LzarGFnt0qimcJbkTxWy6z0vWZFDg@mail.gmail.com> <531874A4.6010908@viagenie.ca> <CAOJ7v-3xasrFG5WVXPd_hA0=OoxvKbAhL2V4erYt7-kGt_JrtA@mail.gmail.com> <53187960.2010709@viagenie.ca> <531DDB5A.4060201@ericsson.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:58:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-1_X1o7hiXW=AZ8FrBAZNYgabeh68QUmNj=1P_S7out0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135f378ff9d1e04f45e57e2
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/6PxY7Pnp81xWIOpw79QoGR7W4GA
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Transports: RFC 6062 support
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:59:15 -0000

The reason I suggested SHOULD NOT is because I think this technique is
unnecessary for WebRTC, and typically net harmful for the reasons that
Matthew mentions.

That said, I would be fine with saying MAY and including some explanatory
text; my main concerns was to avoid the ambiguity that would arise from
leaving this out altogether.


On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Magnus Westerlund <
magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:

> On 2014-03-06 14:34, Simon Perreault wrote:
> > Le 2014-03-06 13:23, Justin Uberti a écrit :
> >> can we agree that TURN TCP candidates are a SHOULD NOT?
> >
> > Not a SHOULD, sure. SHOULD NOT, no.
> >
>
> I would guess that the simplest is to remove discussion of TURN TCP
> altogether from Transports. That would not recommend it nor make it
> disallowed. If we want to be explicit, then simply motivate why we don't
> believe it necessary.
>
> Justin, what is the reason you wanted SHOULD NOT?
>
> cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>