IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12

"Parthasarathi R" <partha@parthasarathi.co.in> Sat, 25 January 2014 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A63C1A0294 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:46:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMxVqIdoQ79a for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:46:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mailhostbox.com (outbound-us3.mailhostbox.com [70.87.28.153]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C0F1A003F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 08:46:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userPC (unknown [122.172.203.180]) (Authenticated sender: partha@parthasarathi.co.in) by smtp.mailhostbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 01193868CAE; Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:46:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parthasarathi.co.in; s=20120823; t=1390668389; bh=Ok9UOVHLBNTmvaBTWo/5/fR82k1ZnJSjsLx9mA//YMU=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Gx/k8mJO1ehpfJWdEAad6/TssQSqcF2Q/NRPkTWL/HI/ZIOTSmT4aDy+0Ta2yCedX yYxek5aNhjFGsQpu2kgTNq3leqT4Y2p8ebr5USsFwvupLTdtF+wyfgctjt6Frne1PQ LCTDUZI7Ke3JC+gd81Vgdkpt+GxbLTbcLgkG3KmU=
From: Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
To: 'Cb B' <cb.list6@gmail.com>, 'Simon Perreault' <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
References: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A2428E32D@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <009601cf17ca$5723cb70$056b6250$@co.in> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1CF32B82@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <004501cf18a1$913c4080$b3b4c180$@co.in> <52E27630.3030300@viagenie.ca> <001c01cf1920$a00c9220$e025b660$@co.in> <52E2952A.2010503@viagenie.ca> <002001cf1927$b502eb00$1f08c100$@co.in> <52E2AE42.5060903@viagenie.ca> <CAD6AjGRAtBx6kCEskgmY2WZ2Rz+=-7e-8jTQEP1CCAt-X=J3fg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGRAtBx6kCEskgmY2WZ2Rz+=-7e-8jTQEP1CCAt-X=J3fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 22:16:14 +0530
Message-ID: <001701cf19ec$f99791b0$ecc6b510$@co.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01CF1A1B.134FCDB0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac8ZZ7Ny5kA1i047TzKQusAUHYEHIwAgUgUw
Content-Language: en-us
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020208.52E3EA65.0041, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-Score: 0.000
X-CTCH-Rules:
X-CTCH-Flags: 0
X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000
X-CTCH-SenderID: partha@parthasarathi.co.in
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalMessages: 1
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSpam: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSuspected: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalBulk: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalConfirmed: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalRecipients: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalVirus: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-BlueWhiteFlag: 0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 70.87.28.151
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:46:34 -0000

Hi Simon,

 

Thanks for your understanding about my firewall/NAT related problem
statement in this draft. 

 

I have proposed the firewall/NAT related text by which the specific
mechanism is not highlighted in the requirement document as there is no WG
consensus for any of the mechanism including TURN. It is possible to argue
hypothetically in PNTAW alias that PCP is the only mechanism required in
WebRTC endpoint.   Also, I’m more interested in WebRTC gateway/server (Sec
4.3. of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12) requirements
wherein it is not required to support TURN and the related mail thread is
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pntaw/current/msg00181.html. 

 

IMO, my proposed text without mentioning any firewall/NAT mechanism in the
requirement document helps to move forward without depend on the solution
discussion in PNTAW alias.

 

Thanks

Partha

 

From: Cb B [mailto:cb.list6@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2014 6:22 AM
To: Simon Perreault
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org; Parthasarathi R
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on
draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12

 


On Jan 24, 2014 10:17 AM, "Simon Perreault" <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
wrote:
>
> Le 2014-01-24 12:14, Parthasarathi R a écrit :
>
>> Please note that when non-IETFers read this requirement document, they
come
>> to the conclusion that IETF RTCWeb WG recommends TURN and not other
>> mechanisms. I'm saying that requirement document should not be used as
the
>> mechanism to eliminate the other alternatives when there is a discussion
>> going-on in PNTAW alias. So, I'm asking for the change.
>
>
> I would totally agree with that sentiment, although I don't see your
proposed text change reflecting it accurately. How about simply:
>
> "Note that TURN support being mandatory does not preclude a WebRTC
endpoint from supporting additional traversal mechanisms."
>
>

+1 for the above text. 

CB

> Simon
> -- 
> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status