IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanism

"Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> Tue, 20 September 2011 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <oej@edvina.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A28E21F8C0E for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rIy0BC6Igdef for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp7.webway.se (smtp7.webway.se [212.3.14.205]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C931B21F8C19 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:d79:1921:6f02:2098:710d] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:d79:1921:6f02:2098:710d]) by smtp7.webway.se (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 37156754BCE4; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:19:31 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
In-Reply-To: <16825C99-401A-40AF-9721-CAF99C6FE7C2@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:19:30 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <548B5B90-F168-4B0D-818C-042B184C00B8@edvina.net>
References: <4E777500.5030201@alvestrand.no> <69262135-CF5D-4E79-85CD-82DFDC4250C0@acmepacket.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233F6F222@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <4E788458.1090108@alvestrand.no> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852233F6F2A0@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <4E788E5C.9090306@alvestrand.no> <11209B22-4D96-4367-BC31-A4D586B55A83@edvina.net> <27019ED4-BE01-474C-886E-D237DBD6CD2C@cisco.com> <FFE7B9DF-9343-4D77-A189-CD1A6813AA19@edvina.net> <16825C99-401A-40AF-9721-CAF99C6FE7C2@cisco.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanism
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:17:07 -0000

20 sep 2011 kl. 22:39 skrev Cullen Jennings:

>>> 
>>> Simplification is good - just make sure that it is possible to gateway to a SIP call to 1-800-go-fedex. A simplification that broke that would, in my personal opinion, would not be acceptable. (and I think that early media is a bit more than just a billing artifact but that's a longer story). You agree?
>> Absolutely, but if the call is in UP state on the rtcweb side as soon as the PSTN/SIP gateway receives early media we will have no issue with sending DTMF in early media, which is what you are trying to trick me with :-)
> 
> really I was not going to mention DTMF :-) 

Background to the fedex/DTMF hints:

Fedex for some reason got a deal not only to send early media from a commercial company, but also have an IVR server and request DTMF while still not answering the call. This forced a code change in quite a lot of SIP servers... ;-)

/O

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email