Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....

Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> Tue, 09 December 2014 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318A51A00EF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:19:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HYa971BeK8a0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:19:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22d.google.com (mail-yk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34A091A00B5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:19:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 19so604622ykq.32 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:19:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KaHjD4PySmbuNAOhmdhn8f1QK/MABajqavMlGVYS99E=; b=ZnXAETDctGCxuKDSEA8gVg8gQYie32PtXdOcripPFSs8im6HLrJS6UfEHNO+HeQhY4 xmIGMw67sJpBH5Z+VQFkxeyfkctExg0WQmVRuo+PVnGhjwvXjSv5k6+cwk8FohuSmrCh IY291HEn8doKg5d75lyoDJ5QnTwEWmvzEltUR8E+xjKPQ4x0DDldQ74LzrXTzqluijaJ 6q3eIVyyel/xvwj+TYv0UKSR3mbsh7PCQ/tcY/hgzbF0mwo7gXARGrZjcHhsg4ROcMXa jZH4+6p1w25yWv3UV/mr6UbzN1OksUQw5PdIgfTbM2ajCsXsvSloHPRS7lzqDbaLvC7v EMfg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.230.104 with SMTP id i98mr4671348yhq.169.1418156356503; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.135.193 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.135.193 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:19:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com>
References: <5486C48D.8040602@alvestrand.no> <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 07:19:16 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2n_L8tiSF+uz40A9P+cAqi-DGgxAiRQVNFA=k1ELETJ+w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01634d6cdd8fc20509ce41ef
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/6hFQnJdHWskanmq5EIKZJnOc6pc
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:19:19 -0000

Nice question, seeing Apple makes so many statements about what they intend
to implement. :-)
Fwiw, we have an iOS webrtc stack and have vp8 support in it. If Apple
opens access to the h264 hardware support on iOS, we would likely hand that
through, too.

Best Regards,
Silvia.
On 10 Dec 2014 04:32, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com> wrote:

>
> > On Dec 9, 2014, at 1:44 , Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
> wrote:
> >
> > I note that the "confirming sense of the room" thread has gotten a lot
> > of messages that are not declaring a position on the question.
> >
> > I also note that from the messages on the thread, I can't figure out if
> > Keith Drage, Gili, Monty Montgomery or Peter Saint-Andre have taken a
> > position (I could guess, but I don't want to - besides, they might not
> > want to take a position, which is perfectly OK).
> >
> > It would be nice for me as a reader if people could:
> >
> > - state their position on the "confirming sense of the room" thread
> > - change the subject line when they want to say anything else
> >
> > That's my preference - of course, people who have "mute thread" in their
> > email readers might want the whole discussion to stay on thread, and
> > will hate me for the last suggestion....
> >
> > Harald
>
> Thanks, Harald, that would help.
>
> I would also like to know from those confirming the sense of the room,
> whether THEY THEMSELVES intend to implement both codecs, or whether they
> conveniently think they don’t need to, and it’s just a problem for other
> people to handle.
>
> Honestly, a +1 for “those other people should do it” is meaningless.
>
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>