Re: [rtcweb] Call for review

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Wed, 06 March 2019 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F92A12F1A2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:52:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NdNiH3p4qJOo for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA20D12008A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id x9so11828883iog.12 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:52:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9EczDv/FiIywRx5CXgsaao7rZ1cN12zHu/X9/gNh9nQ=; b=OTzL+TlGD3SFlD200LZxkik2xhWmriCzd6e2u2nVNrTZlVkukmu4S2Jakl2k5gZhJK tMfrLneaCRf2I/q9a/WFzpZoaHQE20TwUQlXKNtgSIObpboLccaCEevK30BV1ZsaI3Jq AY+GkZyEmAjFT919lowRbS4lOlS+rL6S2vLP8t/kaWuYOVenHbYwm14Uif2vOSd8+09l 3xxff1kgUq1/Gyyo1kVPiVCOlt24vrsveBKrqkgN4nZ3qRBJgjE1Ij5MFP1BIkeiIZwf qRzEnZnoa/FYyuMvkpmbjNkSA3qLVjN94bSMJoO3uiUrD/vxy74ZbDWpI0jfBscZaLdR 1YdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9EczDv/FiIywRx5CXgsaao7rZ1cN12zHu/X9/gNh9nQ=; b=THAasudQYjMfiIscufgEX3x3uu5nDFWLKc2d2MSlBtBZ2VDY8wzyb7lWSE/jKKxGnX wYR4dnYC9IhldQVP+CIjfkyllRW3CFAk4Rg32Qh/N9AGI8M4f6ZKoqJcL0sUTIlLD5ne rJ5VTAy6bJkqkttqS1xNn7wO/3uTmllarwA92u0hvZzaEHPTr3IqtRcVc6Unx4RlSNpe zrwLl92ug3wT27J5Smrf/rW20nU2HB2RRSoUslqc9N+BWwZR+ehiwaagsW6IlDvgYID8 mnePL8FKSTH1Ai96G7wIwx1rGlAovznSMYFc6xIXVTOsJiXVUvjz3hSLq14XmRfYMICF n5Ww==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVuUDSdG6OlEUmjO3tNXvHDVPG4kB2bZ0bpU7MGqpXm3yHlHZvk VUb3aaRhpFbRUGv+Typ0z9uccUdSWLmE9BmIi3LaI0JI
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxmkCLIl3Vmn9wojaREAjIjGmaEim6MCNwejHulpAh4ySqtjW9nZLgzL5DQ3xoqiHiJJOaNHtlftSTVMAmpvp8=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:df01:: with SMTP id f1mr4724256ioq.101.1551916355863; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:52:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+9kkMBEzEFtRyvApTs9p4AvixMFO0Fe-Z+Wk5mh09ZxY_4uOQ@mail.gmail.com> <3AAE140F-F6BC-4C5F-A5AF-DE81A8876C21@westhawk.co.uk> <CAOJ7v-3YE7xFGoP21R46Ok5nrMK1qkWRQ63kBCuuhHqkAmRs6Q@mail.gmail.com> <3a0ca676-e43a-d45c-b82c-22287a764a79@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3a0ca676-e43a-d45c-b82c-22287a764a79@gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:52:24 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-37SBt-D7CwYT8Xo+hm7=QoXrPuzbdGy4bG=uKuir8SVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001d1c1b058375afe0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/6jSl0Ruqk-ycvc5vuQ6IzrGy7zc>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for review
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 23:52:39 -0000

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:45 AM Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>;
wrote:

> On 06.03.19 04:34, Justin Uberti wrote:
> > We'll always mask any local addresses with mDNS, since we don't know if
> > they're public or not. We will also provide a srflx candidate with the
> > actual address should STUN tell us that information.
>
> IIRC that would mean a publicly reachable local IP address would still
> be masked with mDNS first. Once the STUN server's answer arrives, a
> srflx candidate with the exposed IP address must be handed out. Is that
> assumption correct?
>

Exactly correct.