IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Strawman for how to prevent voice-hammer without ICE

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Thu, 28 July 2011 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6600B21F8B39 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1OZbQZtDicRu for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ETMail2.acmepacket.com (etmail2.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AFD21F886A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by ETMail2.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:27:26 -0400
Received: from mailbox1.acmepacket.com ([216.41.24.12]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:30:30 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:30:30 -0400
Thread-Topic: Strawman for how to prevent voice-hammer without ICE
Thread-Index: AcxNO0ioZYET1fWMReOTEY+QHVeOlQ==
Message-ID: <818C0CB4-CB51-490B-B023-549E5C6F4364@acmepacket.com>
References: <B6527F21-4DE2-46B1-AE2E-891D56461313@acmepacket.com> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA08F1D75CF6@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <464DADBD-EEBE-43C8-8552-EAA40FBB610D@acmepacket.com> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA08F1D75E24@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA08F1D75E24@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAUA=
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Strawman for how to prevent voice-hammer without ICE
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:30:32 -0000

On Jul 28, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Elwell, John wrote:

> [JRE] This assumes RTP-RTCP multiplexing, which not many current devices support.

No, I didn't mean to assume multiplexing.  Sorry if it was confusing.  I meant if you're worried about using RTP reception to allow transmission because in some cases RTP isn't sent from the far end for periods of time, then one could use the reception of RTCP on the odd port to allow the sending of RTP on the even.  

I was already assuming multiplexing would not likely be used with legacy voip devices, since none of them do it today.

-hadriel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email