[rtcweb] Draft-proust-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop
Paul Coverdale <coverdale@sympatico.ca> Mon, 24 February 2014 15:23 UTC
Return-Path: <coverdale@sympatico.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4284D1A0104 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:23:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.001
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_80=2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gUDkYZUmGiPq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:23:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s10.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s10.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.85]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C6E1A0102 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:23:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP100 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s10.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:23:54 -0800
X-TMN: [aeNLm/Mpy/hHfvG/UbIUX8Pynuot7FpA]
X-Originating-Email: [coverdale@sympatico.ca]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP1006A2F5D99681B78DC94CED0860@phx.gbl>
Received: from PaulNewPC ([74.12.62.240]) by BLU0-SMTP100.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:23:53 -0800
From: Paul Coverdale <coverdale@sympatico.ca>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:23:51 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0041_01CF314A.83A40860"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac8xdGvn5+ttPje2T0GUNZrrdMIWGA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2014 15:23:53.0969 (UTC) FILETIME=[6D79A610:01CF3174]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/6u9DJabEkUZsjocw54xKBwtghdM
Subject: [rtcweb] Draft-proust-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-interop
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:23:56 -0000
This draft seems like a good start to address the issue of interoperability of audio codecs in WebRTC. As has been pointed out in previous postings, AMR, AMR-WB and G.722 are particularly attractive codecs which should be included, but I note that the authors have left the opportunity for including others. ...Paul
- [rtcweb] Draft-proust-rtcweb-audio-codecs-for-int… Paul Coverdale