[rtcweb] Dependencies on drafts in our documents

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 14 August 2013 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF9A21F9FDA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 04:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.024
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.024 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.575, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U7wI72X3VqmV for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 04:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA2211E8131 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 04:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627DB39E4EA for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:30:34 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5r-OCozT1RGu for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:30:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hta-dell.lul.corp.google.com (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:1043:1:be30:5bff:fede:bcdc]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A239639E1C2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:30:33 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <520B6A59.1050104@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 13:30:33 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [rtcweb] Dependencies on drafts in our documents
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:30:42 -0000

Greetings,

department of small hacks: As part of updating the -overview document, I 
wrote a small dependency graph extractor, to see what we are looking at 
in terms of getting things done.

Here's what I came up with as direct and indirect *normative* 
dependencies for -overview (with all the normal caveats for text 
processing utilities invented from scratch in an afternoon):

draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis
draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream
draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation
draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp
draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio
draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel
draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep
draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview
draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage
draft-ietf-rtcweb-security
draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch
draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps
draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-protocol
draft-muthu-behave-consent-freshness
draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri
draft-rescorla-mmusic-ice-trickle
draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps

There's also these links that don't reference any current draft:

Missing file: draft-rescorla-mmusic-ice-trickle-00 in 
internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-03.txt
Missing file: draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-01 in 
internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-04.txt
Missing file: draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-01 in 
internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-06.txt

Now - apart from those drafts - do the chairs or the participants know 
of OTHER drafts that should be referenced, directly or indirectly, from 
the -overview draft?