Re: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser RTC trapezoid)

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 19 October 2011 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E901F0C5F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.34
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.263, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_18=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y7VdHF1nttCZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1526F1F0C5B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so2287302vcb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.155.81 with SMTP id r17mr353897vcw.6.1319053500204; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.118.143 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159A20@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
References: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF511599F9@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <4E9E5D8D.6030707@alvestrand.no> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159A20@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:45:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfk+Ezaz2Y4kFkooSozJsDyZZWxqdpX=fec==PYzBHm-bw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser RTC trapezoid)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:45:03 -0000

2011/10/19 Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>;:
> If you don't have a clear view of the Javascript execution model, I
> recommend spending a few hours with an introductory Javascript text and
> playing with writing some Javascript in your own web pages. It will save
> lots of confused emails to the list.
>
> <partha> In fact I tried couple of W3Cschools Javascript before starting the
> mail thread in RTCWeb. I’ll learn more terminology in Javascript to clearly
> present my ideas </partha>

Hi Ravindran, please let me understand:

You recognize that you have no knowledge of JavaScript (you started
reading some tutorials of JavaScript *yesterday*) but your draft
clearly states:

------------------------
Abstract

  [...]
  There are lots of issues in Javascript based signaling protocol.
  [...]
------------------------

And in other mail(s) you assert:

------------------------
<partha> I’m not favor Inaki solution of SIP over websocket because it
is overkill for signaling protocol. [...]</partha>
------------------------


So how should I interpret it? how can you make such assertions without
knowledge?. I don't consider that to be very polite, and for me that
means that you want to discredit proposals different than yours.


Regards.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>;