Re: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser RTC trapezoid)

[Iñaki Baz Castillo <[e-mail]>]

2011/10/19 Ravindran Parthasarathi <[e-mail]>:
> If you don't have a clear view of the Javascript execution model, I
> recommend spending a few hours with an introductory Javascript text and
> playing with writing some Javascript in your own web pages. It will save
> lots of confused emails to the list.
>
> <partha> In fact I tried couple of W3Cschools Javascript before starting the
> mail thread in RTCWeb. I’ll learn more terminology in Javascript to clearly
> present my ideas </partha>

Hi Ravindran, please let me understand:

You recognize that you have no knowledge of JavaScript (you started
reading some tutorials of JavaScript *yesterday*) but your draft
clearly states:

------------------------
Abstract

  [...]
  There are lots of issues in Javascript based signaling protocol.
  [...]
------------------------

And in other mail(s) you assert:

------------------------
<partha> I’m not favor Inaki solution of SIP over websocket because it
is overkill for signaling protocol. [...]</partha>
------------------------


So how should I interpret it? how can you make such assertions without
knowledge?. I don't consider that to be very polite, and for me that
means that you want to discredit proposals different than yours.


Regards.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[e-mail]>