IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Prioritization

"Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Fri, 25 April 2014 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1AE1A05D1 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N3liYYOIlogY for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1lp0142.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E4F1A0679 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CH1PR03CA005.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.156.150) by BY2PR03MB505.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.143.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.921.12; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:03:50 +0000
Received: from BL2FFO11FD006.protection.gbl (10.255.156.132) by CH1PR03CA005.outlook.office365.com (10.255.156.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.929.12 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:03:50 +0000
Received: from mail.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BL2FFO11FD006.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.161.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.929.8 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:03:49 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.193) by TK5EX14HUBC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.80.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.7; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:03:09 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC298.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.1.224]) by TK5EX14MLTC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.193]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.002; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:03:09 +0000
From: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Prioritization
Thread-Index: AQHPYIVjkPq1Tfael0+4dMESGUjujZsiUXSAgAAJBICAABM2gIAABB6AgAAc5ICAAABOkA==
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:03:09 +0000
Message-ID: <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484504DFEA3@TK5EX14MBXC298.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <20140425084726.8812.24604.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <535A21E3.7070008@alvestrand.no> <535A5ACC.9070700@viagenie.ca> <535A6151.1060501@alvestrand.no> <535A68E1.9090901@viagenie.ca> <535A78FF.20700@alvestrand.no> <535A7C73.6050701@viagenie.ca> <CABkgnnWkOGdSzP42rZ-aGjFkGDOOGOfk64rq-80GjeVPZJAqaw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWkOGdSzP42rZ-aGjFkGDOOGOfk64rq-80GjeVPZJAqaw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.37]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(438001)(52044002)(377454003)(51444003)(13464003)(24454002)(51704005)(189002)(199002)(44976005)(46102001)(15975445006)(87936001)(2656002)(83322001)(80022001)(84676001)(97736001)(6806004)(54356999)(76482001)(97756001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(4396001)(99396002)(55846006)(50466002)(85852003)(92566001)(46406003)(79102001)(92726001)(16796002)(85806002)(81342001)(77982001)(33656001)(50986999)(76176999)(80976001)(2009001)(47776003)(23726002)(81542001)(31966008)(74662001)(74502001)(20776003)(86362001)(66066001)(83072002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB505; H:mail.microsoft.com; FPR:1C8EE575.113454C1.79EB7727.CAE4F1EB.20252; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-O365ENT-EOP-Header: Message processed by - O365_ENT: Allow from ranges (Engineering ONLY)
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0192E812EC
Received-SPF: Pass (: domain of skype.net designates 131.107.125.37 as permitted sender) receiver=; client-ip=131.107.125.37; helo=mail.microsoft.com;
X-OriginatorOrg: skype.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/7hZpuChrlKKmIKnjNCf1iy14hXo
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Prioritization
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:04:11 -0000

If a "lower priority" packet is dispatched before a "higher priority" packet in order to "prevent starvation", then what does "higher priority" mean?

Streams that are deliberately set to take resources from other streams should behave that way. Otherwise the knob shouldn't be labeled the way it is.

Matthew Kaufman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin
> Thomson
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 10:01 AM
> To: Simon Perreault
> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Prioritization
> 
> On 25 April 2014 08:17, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
> wrote:
> > I'll shut up now. I see your point. If nobody else feels this issue is
> > important, feel free to ignore my comment.
> 
> Honestly, I was originally inclined to agree with you, but the SHOULD leaves
> plenty of wiggle room for those who think they know better.
> 
> I think that providing motivation in the document - something like "This
> ensures that lower priority streams receive fewer resources, but cannot be
> completely blocked by those at higher priority." - would help to ensure that
> people who think they know better - and don't - can't screw things up too
> much.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status