Re: [rtcweb] No Plan

Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> Thu, 30 May 2013 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777A421F86CA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2013 15:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vMr3bZxJD-F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2013 15:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6607721F8555 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 May 2013 15:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u57so703308wes.40 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 May 2013 15:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3vCE8Jisy/ooVpq3AEMR55ntXH2cJ6B0OmZGkKIkMPc=; b=g2W9v8v7jvgfvVmWcugAlF3896CjOjoRf5VUyl53GrnkKUhpTdfraJ0vo+tJejFjG9 p1IF3uGu+m3+gol5ZEWNz+srqYrMQSODMxLyB/XERRNtuBaW3AaDEo+kWks2YP85CDE8 NqFpUjZ7c8HzUhrdOxUTJv9WLDnQaHSVopw3G8FFgwUsPeKB3kGsM/9ENAyffb7tB2mO 3O6Y05b/u6rWO7Y++moW8+Bk2giJiyzgOw/3WpqlUSX7YCPVranjIR/EBlILHIpUv021 RGyCCf6nrfPGC9gf0iRGhb/CIRULRg5GWCIDJ3P4OFNHg8pHd/cNEINMl23K/FmiQ2Dj yQ9w==
X-Received: by 10.180.149.131 with SMTP id ua3mr592510wib.55.1369951618434; Thu, 30 May 2013 15:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([90.165.220.207]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fv11sm122975wic.11.2013.05.30.15.06.56 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 30 May 2013 15:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51A7CD81.2060805@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 00:06:57 +0200
From: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <51A65017.4090502@jitsi.org> <51A7BEBE.2040302@omnitor.se> <CALiegfk6XchF4U1Orpd6oJsydz-VGtBQ=CwaWrPa_KjsaQynYQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfk6XchF4U1Orpd6oJsydz-VGtBQ=CwaWrPa_KjsaQynYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] No Plan
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 22:07:00 -0000

El 30/05/2013 23:33, Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
> 2013/5/30 Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>se>:
>> I find it to be good to have a specified ambition for legacy
>> interoperability.
>> But I cannot see how we could specify it without RTP based real-time text on
>> the SIP side.
> So honestly I don't understand why WebRTC should care about "text 
> messaging via RTP", and I really hope that "MSRP" word is never 
> included in any RTCWEB WG specification. IMHO it's already enough 
> having 3 proposals attempting to adapt SDP into WebRTC requirements. 

To be fair, only two proposals try to modify the SDP, the third about 
not adapting the SDP or change the O/A model.

> Gateways are required, in any way, for connecting WebRTC and the world 
> outside (SIP, PSTN, etc), let's leave those gateways to do the "magic" 
> instead of proposing that a browser can send text messages via RTP to 
> a SIP phone. Just my opinion.

Indeed. I understand Gunnar requirements for RTT, but as you say, to 
connect to legacy devices you would need a gateway in the middle anyway. 
If the gateway support datachannels, It would be fairly trivial to 
bridge the real time text data from T140 rtp packets from/to the browser.

Best regards
Sergio