Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Wed, 19 June 2013 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A8821F9F9B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.654
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.654 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H9fiMq-TQ93Z for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x236.google.com (mail-qa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F387021F9F47 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n20so266203qaj.13 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=T9PcpmD2hmL2fHdbqeLSOnB3AoxbIO3jI+1UDw4tWLU=; b=e/eKggS/KKhLp+ruQZ9PJVQ9iXG/suLVL1EIDygWORkJHONr6MfB0vzXLJtKb3RsUY odYlgQIlEsQQTS9shhDy8V23rcGRQkEaad3jOsKOPjA+CJX4Al9b7EG33yb6harSmXlV A+Wje/pmxNkvBJAMcmH6R7aVp2COACstoG/EU/loFi+FzppZGh0yxg/t/k02G0pqT7om I7btrmXibhs1N3G7Ti6R1UTWS8kc7Z33xWsbJoT+BH3qMWhTN89u9WXUFjTTbnhiHuWw +DhjiKa+ONpEt8ce4IWzsNVpV0mBLc29VKdoHWy/WidAhIPE/Y0d3i6GWxwGTdaNj9Mj JlRg==
X-Received: by 10.49.35.233 with SMTP id l9mr2179464qej.23.1371632109271; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.67.65 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AEA92@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDk2L3SBPC08WU_5RcL16-Wzv8Mocj3-Qzmxz2E24ERGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfk39prkSinDCisSqOAD8yJZuGUwLAMBabao7eHuhnAYcA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AEA92@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:54:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegfk_9dJ2shD7F1XjcFz0t_OPv_pDCn8AtDGgSSWEXhEH2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkctVukTMPKSSEiRSSxxPqUSK2GGYskrgtiKeZFBlyO2QOT4wvz6jqRWpIzyaHP7sw8FbXT
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:55:11 -0000

2013/6/19 Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>om>:
> Iñaki,
>
> You are the one who requested the debate to be re-opened. Are you saying that I need to go through previous discussions to figure out what you want to debate - or to figure out what you THINK you want to debate? :)


Hi Christer,

As far as I see I not alone in this venture :)

Anyhow, if others agree, take the paragraph in my previous mail (My
"non-normative" summary) as a small summary of what we want to debate
and propose.

Regards.


P.S: But IMHO the complete rationale for this request is better
described in the 3 links I told you ;)

--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>