Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7489A21F9E31 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.594
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1aVJ+GYlaU8Z for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com [209.85.192.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B9021F9E62 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id y14so5387531pdi.16 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=/GbIUtR2CzQWKsPvVh2P65bifK3QA6kRziKMyoL99UA=; b=GXpkWMmOuuJsgTg73w57nSLDC30oCGCjoDliiAGTFgkhwLiLiYqaLgvYCk8pH0POFw 0XM2M5PvnTg4MzULhF9gkeP6966tryGCfzwVAZkex8hJA6QiZoRNeCsMzDuUEiPg2Vo7 r8L21eGInKbIG6Itl6BvGmT+p/M5m7IiahTSViKEZT3YF5p+COrk8vDHVW238nUDxYql W1tLYtT3fFpu91YOgSWm3XHE4MJnGTp/qBK2sq8B714BDK6ngGRRgtgjoOnZTKvFygry AlnsO7S12s41np4L70cOtMDFynwp7mzQYzSMh+uzeAxPSaDnqu9gLlF2G5qufGDJeDHl jCQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=/GbIUtR2CzQWKsPvVh2P65bifK3QA6kRziKMyoL99UA=; b=Cgo/Yml9B+PHWLX/fCiTC9ppuK9AZeQEuWVDCycYQrn9WvR7EXv9aovnPFWg/3rSyJ vJd/J+Y8LL2j1rdzi7b5+cnC0BgYm7qohrPULzcrDNjmHsSrb/ZyBV72qt/3uvj3XK3v hoe0lagaSIwdKnXt4U3t+RCWOi1zGn8juZusXs6Nl1bfbLLdHJrLaR5eiN5b1tc33Vpa zP+kQcTCCIglGRxlOxqRSMFQEMgshEVaR5uQMfplUSJPu2DSHjGq+y1bdNjoPZ037DoC zoG+J84zMYEjlts24RCv66nC8V4NAhQO8Z9bXFMjxUSXb016SgYDd7bfQJ2wPCIgleHr aIgw==
X-Received: by 10.68.163.165 with SMTP id yj5mr3946354pbb.141.1371665283428; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.88.8 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfkPFE0Oywqz6GRUkZE1jWKKMPa88JqFT84eJuDdTJ+2tg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDk2L3SBPC08WU_5RcL16-Wzv8Mocj3-Qzmxz2E24ERGg@mail.gmail.com> <51C0C1A0.9010107@nostrum.com> <CAJrXDUGqSvsosZJhcRR-kCwEX1g_wvPnSZPmmcNwggk+Z9WNCA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CALiegfk39prkSinDCisSqOAD8yJZuGUwLAMBabao7eHuhnAYcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHe=vu2695xAkg2tKvQ7J5JNqraHCpY0rKx5rDQ0xCpiA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=GbR3K0dzMkaMWu88WdNY4JWQOmDPKeNfZQNuC5d4bog@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUHG7ENOu12SkRpXOik3ArEShPHAJhtOwYyR3UaSDvQFOA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=SiPkCD6b1Z+hkgkbtT1bbxtytWyYRxH3CUGDvJOztRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUF6uujp2jYCJgxp4kTctAFDWBBU-bWhJp4iMNDuc6A+3w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfm_CLRBTmuJhjhrxNb5XPHGmFD9Lip37xYLVOBTxM6j_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUGqTGCR3reZ3=PkzQE7bhvjhyNGpdCiM-TCDnusNOxjjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfkPFE0Oywqz6GRUkZE1jWKKMPa88JqFT84eJuDdTJ+2tg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:07:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUHaEBbA8AdWniUpAhBNgVw2_vu_7Hbi_nAGFSeBMccP6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86d556f84b8404df85b59d
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQneb7mtYQHXT0wHjDL2VDW39BwdWh2CIg3rF5n7/QW3TJ6HyscYo/lqiukTVRrYTTHvEc/oTuq9uRv0wPAywzAsacGmBFwwerM1DyTqrZ9jz7G1BkaDVzpVY/P+59MKgP9jWdqoBB7dAvJ2N04nEL58xtLvhm3I6B+TvA4vBWTye4Bhpyhy+SXXdfE4DPLvLcwQVRme
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:08:09 -0000

That is precisely the argument that will be used against you to do
everything with SDP and only SDP.


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> 2013/6/19 Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>om>:
> > I don't think it's removal of SDP that you want.  I think what you want
> is a
> > way to use the API without using SDP.  If the SDP is still there, but you
> > don't have to use it, you're still happy, right?
>
> AFAIK no API in the world provides two ways to do the same, or at
> least, no API provide them with the same "quality" and "affection".
> Duplicating the work does not seem a long-term solution IMHO.
>
> But I may be wrong :)
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>
>