Re: [rtcweb] Call for review

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Wed, 06 March 2019 03:34 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73891130E30 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 19:34:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OAbXnniyAYe5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 19:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x131.google.com (mail-it1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D9DB127AC2 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 19:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x131.google.com with SMTP id z131so7421228itf.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 19:34:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Cjni4tYyHcIYoU9P4TSgufu1KYgWczRQfXmf+TGL8cE=; b=ClEO/GOGpW+f4stCt1bLu/unA2uAVT1H1pXcHxO2C9+Ad5CE+/VLcv5nRJHC+6L1Zx ISNR5uCy3c9a/xCYWtJ/P5G1MbTRrhossg+tVzLX/ItWtT9PXPHVpFFFrLmYPAJRpN/n lzCAUtXv8RkbgkYMFM4sXnx0vXdAwcv8PinZ8Gm0uukunYPVd/gevH3bCbUwH3l/pNRU GY1sjVBoS5x7IEYfmGRITAjaKdiuOs6YwJXfW45i/igj29t6Fbf8sbNfhZ6dj/oqT7G/ MmijDdDY4Tnou0s081ADwL47DL69B5WdDbDHFw/6tZWBWLqsRarmniRS+1mOxzYokpsm +FtQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Cjni4tYyHcIYoU9P4TSgufu1KYgWczRQfXmf+TGL8cE=; b=Pmq+SafC0CaVNWOmBYfNiKVm1DORD8L6OdDEHrRFqPbhy3S0dIX0Nu2riQS4nlctCq Li7x0vhl8PL+D6OllynPur8jX01y2AXbVtNxzaDmsfZf+pFGFZQvYBj9qlBVzRWjD7JC llN6unofMCHW9m/MbDT+2PNtmMDoZvv96gmfj1DRZPV2is/Q+wEpMaZFSbTh/lRhYe7w NRmOXlWPvRpKo3faNZkl9lBOiFaXam52J0vf7r17dBhkO1COt5M/BbwYrpG3ty6gA+V+ RrrGkd/JY0Bn0bru8vE3RhGmHAKFm+tTeR3ckPVFrpdt9JNKxTaIWCNPWgwPB7MSgqOa cu3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVLKDxlBhADDQag3aP7FF770Jq3T8G/70oDhAWG3S1XGZxMod+Q JwXFnJ4JbOrEjNKC2g13W/0p0hPjVyqeHU4cdT26ow==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwtcsPxI4ppWFg5tGiiJgQF1guAjaTSsPtYrR8Q022L6uPjqUcuk4jLHTdxmxbxgFVC+ohIbpVw4OOwH/C7lU8=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:ccc5:: with SMTP id x188mr910178itf.123.1551843263583; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 19:34:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+9kkMBEzEFtRyvApTs9p4AvixMFO0Fe-Z+Wk5mh09ZxY_4uOQ@mail.gmail.com> <3AAE140F-F6BC-4C5F-A5AF-DE81A8876C21@westhawk.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3AAE140F-F6BC-4C5F-A5AF-DE81A8876C21@westhawk.co.uk>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 19:34:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-3YE7xFGoP21R46Ok5nrMK1qkWRQ63kBCuuhHqkAmRs6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000797c8d058364aab2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/7zopUbk98rAHyrJlc2mwv5VGyCg>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for review
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 03:34:27 -0000

We'll always mask any local addresses with mDNS, since we don't know if
they're public or not. We will also provide a srflx candidate with the
actual address should STUN tell us that information.

Agree though we should be consistent on terminology, will look into what
the best option is there.

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:40 PM westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk>; wrote:

> On first reading it seems like there might be a conflation of private IP
> addresses and local IP addresses.
> the [ip-handling] document uses the term 'Private local IP addresses’
> where as this document
> uses "private IP addresses” in the introduction but then uses "The local
> IPv4 address” without any
> explanation (I can find) of the difference.
>
> Surely this would mean that a standalone device (say a public kiosk)
> assigned a
> single routable public IP would mask that address with mdns.
>
> Tim.
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 5 Mar 2019, at 20:22, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
> >
> > Howdy,
> >
> > draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-mdns is a very short draft describing two
> new modes  related to draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling using bits of
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates.
> >
> > The chairs would like to ask for a couple of reviews; given that it is
> four pages long, we are hopeful that it will not take much time.
> >
> > Please send your review to the list,
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Ted
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>