IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 05 December 2014 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5CD1A6F84 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:28:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TLaZVv9ia9w4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:28:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 144341A1B54 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Orochi.local ([12.216.224.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sB5MSoig049862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 16:28:50 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [12.216.224.110] claimed to be Orochi.local
Message-ID: <5482319E.1060501@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 14:28:46 -0800
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <547511DB.5050100@nostrum.com> <54759A4C.6020806@gmail.com> <5476092D.4010406@nostrum.com> <15EF2452-2C2C-420B-B972-C37EACE57850@apple.com> <CALiegfkbiN1BAaJyrqOzUeYiViCGHcs6QaM7VVHwUzCUVAuKBw@mail.gmail.com> <32C6F602-6818-4A36-B18E-BF21774F6761@apple.com> <20141205035706.GB21150@hex.shelbyville.oz> <C56EF8F1-FE24-4DF9-9869-49795BD34AC1@apple.com> <CA+9kkMCGp+WdcFomT53qfC2xY8LPYWTtaYiLDBbQ-AZZG1dyOg@mail.gmail.com> <ED88A5CB-C173-46EA-992F-7A57F962B7B0@apple.com> <CA+9kkMDM4SedfnvpYzEKu=+hWi-N_1b-nki=Pkch3sWCFkGqXg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOW+2dsHJQ1pVcYGEtX_NfRfmUqfKS7HAfhHWv+wrt2BAMRkTg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOW+2dsHJQ1pVcYGEtX_NfRfmUqfKS7HAfhHWv+wrt2BAMRkTg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/8-MnKWOQnc6PigAtnrIp-go9g68
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:28:54 -0000

On 12/5/14 13:25, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> [BA] What I heard was quite different.  A lot of folks were in favor 
> of having *others* undertake a dual MTI obligation so they could 
> benefit.  I did not hear a lot of folks claim that *they themselves* 
> were willing to undertake the obligation for their own benefit or the 
> benefit of WebRTC.  Big difference.

Hi there.

/a

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status