Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03: (with COMMENT)
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 04 May 2016 03:23 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA4712D85D; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GPq27dew8guk; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25B8512D74B; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id u185so48414235iod.3; Tue, 03 May 2016 20:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=WimKkK65ZD3cvGB9ghSCJgUaSv/byEmE+zjv85cJibQ=; b=hbTSr7fx4ZW4HfygvVFgE8cEFq5i7+W6YvpdREt9AIteVRS0/OzmFZcprf++aPqMaU UVRm/8Va2z+WF3x/btnnbwbEFU8Edxd3rANZRxygBCB2d5qFhUvrjDhGizNqPCmuOP94 HSb4y08dSAISFx4blIIWdg78EWaOtk3ToF6N8/mPvfx4HP9dhs7aQosd9hDAT87KrO6z ri9octtHcuadq45FpikH86uKnSN4DXc2tR4xyHbKv2UpSgRqd0fnYsUW1dDpMN6sAHZi 5orFIO/WqVQLbVit7shXvm4kMDcvdtEZpcvYdSTP1H9N3mcTWsFvcY07Tugs1YDY6/ik OGGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=WimKkK65ZD3cvGB9ghSCJgUaSv/byEmE+zjv85cJibQ=; b=kydYi3e4PIWGwdJhch7iukZpFI11OqQgJnU1twDyQ/AyEgZMBH/8bzy8NDBqpFQ2Ny 4e61DCIYFJkWqZUL+BLK4G70q6dAv81R95mewFZ4m9SI5hp46LOfpmFgCISWbUS9tZZX e/YeYacsnxTwHWuiowUIu/bRwW8iYYj0MmcnmrN8KPPafMSUoZwovH4Zd4rjZzyQacmG 3Fe767tLtPRuq5I18iSzM9UMQ+8av/IFmUGb7jsrDvS47+Er+iUyLbV4VW0eRBFXkkug TajVmEjNr4Wv4x3pLzJ7VUoFaRJ3W6lR/Tfsm5/4cOt9coJ3KxVciBdoRWJR97iWhhtL zRkg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUprwaNL4ZE+Vx6dKIoO58O5CD+1pHmQN4KHgvAWbr/ZuxrpYXVSudtfWnqKohdocy9BzqJVzlvTY9VHw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.59.85 with SMTP id i82mr7079810ioa.108.1462332212531; Tue, 03 May 2016 20:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.82 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160504024043.8242.33067.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160504024043.8242.33067.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 13:23:32 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXef6uO0ZVZyiR5A8EeEAAGsLVJ9T8r4-QxS-qKAFWLZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/8E4SUxtZuY6swUS0gk0UbqcpgWE>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn@ietf.org, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-alpn-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 03:23:35 -0000
On 4 May 2016 at 12:40, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote: > Should I-D.ietf-rtcweb-security-arch be a normative reference, due to the > citation in section 4? That was intended largely as a "such as", would be clearer if it were changed to: Peer authentication, such as that provided by Section X of [I-D.ietf...arch], ...
- [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtc… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtc… Ben Campbell
- Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtc… Martin Thomson