Re: [rtcweb] Some thoughts on optional audio codecs

Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it> Tue, 16 July 2013 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D80611E80DC for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 07:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K1xxC8wnwC6V for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 07:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GRFEDG701RM001.telecomitalia.it (grfedg701rm001.telecomitalia.it [217.169.121.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A2811E80EE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 07:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grfhub701rm001.griffon.local (10.19.3.8) by GRFEDG701RM001.telecomitalia.it (10.173.88.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.297.1; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:35:27 +0200
Received: from MacLab.local (163.162.180.246) by smtp.telecomitalia.it (10.19.9.234) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.297.1; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:35:26 +0200
Message-ID: <51E55A2E.8090303@telecomitalia.it>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:35:26 +0200
From: Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22DEE3029@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22DEE3029@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060107060607000700050401"
X-TI-Disclaimer: Disclaimer1
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Some thoughts on optional audio codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:35:34 -0000

On 7/15/13 5:15 PM, Bo Burman wrote:
> In that draft, I would prefer something more in line with:
> 
> "If other suitable audio codecs are available to the browser to use,
> it is recommended that they are also included in the offer in order
> to maximize the possibility to establish the session without the need
> for audio transcoding".

Yes, in fact this is happening already:
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2013/01/firefox-development-highlights-h-264-mp3-support-on-windows-scoped-stylesheets-more/

If people feel SHOULD/RECOMMENDED to be too strong, I'm sure we can find
the right keyword in RFC 6919..

Enrico