IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Filling in details on "trickle ICE"

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 24 August 2012 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FD421F86B0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.323, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tsmI2L9PX6WG for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41FD21F869A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbky2 with SMTP id y2so484753lbk.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=P6k/SrDHjIKlhXoe1YKKABY8CRrt6eEUixRBup3uZnM=; b=BkQsdRrAY65o+eYXxtm7v+bBEJ8Ta/xMTI7n45iKvIqil7AOFSJaisbaBz6fWgpXfO mZd91mlraBZS2ZAkzoeD2vTnIhfjLSPHdeeWcEXEysU1nTkZxqhW4LoULuz4lq5Q14/O fcKFwDqtI+g2JtT9QtAbUwF83t2qoP6gjDaG9EcIQVx+m0DRsjJ8kh8k0H6Tr/4JANsv iephty3UJZTG9lLWRFFYqpDOB/pzyUB83MWeJ6HTSkTmO07MTK/MWFAwbWwriJ8wojSS 5oqJ2d/QAbeFmYVgHwbttQLDUgyfOOUKTHT21c15w/Pi1tS7J4aZk/W6pgygLgIl8iQZ Jupg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.123.206 with SMTP id mc14mr6328677lab.33.1345823701808; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.41.193 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMzgAs=hK38hCjS7t6yLjkTydS2TQUb8R3rBbRKGakVdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBMzgAs=hK38hCjS7t6yLjkTydS2TQUb8R3rBbRKGakVdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:55:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVBBAH=HCkn_cksBs_9A_hm=VfFwcTtvOM3C7XB2h2KTA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Filling in details on "trickle ICE"
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:55:07 -0000

On 24 August 2012 08:14, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> I've been working on doing Firefox's trickle ICE implementation and
> have had to make a bunch of decisions that suggest to me that perhaps
> we need an update to RFC 5245 to specify exactly how trickle ICE
> behaves. Here are some of the things we need to resolve.

These are not necessarily interoperability issues.  You can solve all
of these problems without creating another RFC.

You make the decision to start and stop, succeed or fail, nominate or
leave.  That decision might be guided by an RFC, but you are
responsible for what your code does.

...unless you consider it impossible to take actions unless those
actions have the blessing of RFC5245.

--Martin

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status