[rtcweb] Fwd: W3C mailing-list [was Re: Updated W3C draft charter for Web RTC WG]

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 12 April 2011 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8C5E07BB for <rtcweb@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ci3eDx4YyDsj for <rtcweb@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408BFE066B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C104239E15D; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:28:31 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zACE+lvSnBRq; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:28:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.16.49.75] (unknown [74.125.121.33]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7202039E113; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:28:29 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4DA44596.3@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:29:10 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtc-web@alvestrand.no" <rtc-web@alvestrand.no>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080005070907060009030808"
Subject: [rtcweb] Fwd: W3C mailing-list [was Re: Updated W3C draft charter for Web RTC WG]
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:29:16 -0000

This is to be the official public list of the (still in-formation) W3C 
WG for WebRTC.
Welcome!

                           Harald

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	W3C mailing-list [was Re: Updated W3C draft charter for Web 
RTC WG]
Date: 	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:48:09 +0200
From: 	Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
To: 	Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>



Hi Harald,

The public-webrtc@w3.org mailing-list is up and running.

To subscribe to the mailing-list, one needs to send an email to public-webrtc-request@w3.org with subject "subscribe", or click on the "subscribe to this list" option on the archives page.

The archives are available at:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/

Francois.





On 04/07/2011 11:27 AM, Francois Daoust wrote:
>  On 04/07/2011 10:50 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>>  Francios,
>>
>>  a) waiting for anything from me?
>
>  No, I'm waiting for replies from reviewers to my own replies [1] before I can get back to W3C management with a disposition of comments to ask for their formal approval of the changes and chairs nomination.
>
>  David Baron's already replied that he's ok with the proposed changes, so I'm waiting for Chaals feedback in particular. Not a big deal if we don't hear back from other reviewers.
>
>
>>  b) are things firm enough that we can create a public-webrtc-whatever@w3.org mailing list and start using it for API discussions?
>
>  That's usually done when the group gets created, but we can certainly do that before, yes. I've just requested the creation of a public-webrtc@w3.org mailing-list. It may take a few days for this request to be processed by the systems team.
>
>  Francois.
>
>  [1] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Member/search?keywords=daoust&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=real-time&index-grp=Member__FULL+Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=w3c-archive
>
>>
>>  Harald
>>
>>  On 04/04/11 11:11, Francois Daoust wrote:
>>>  Hi Harald,
>>>
>>>  It took some time for lack of time and connection last week, but I've eventually made a few changes to the W3C draft charter for Web RTC. See latest version at:
>>>  http://www.w3.org/2010/12/webrtc-charter.html
>>>
>>>  The diff is available at:
>>>  http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2010%2F12%2Fwebrtc-charter-initial.html&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2010%2F12%2Fwebrtc-charter.html
>>>
>>>  List of changes:
>>>  - liaison with Web and TV IG (for home networking scenarios) added
>>>  - "any new" added to the mention that audio and video codecs are out of scope to respond to Art Barstow's comment, as that seemed benign enough.
>>>  - milestones section completed. Let me know if you have comments on this initial roadmap. I've merged all functions into one single row to keep things simple.
>>>  - decision policy copied from HTML charter
>>>  - deliverables section completed to put more emphasis on collaboration with IETF without mandating any specific text, using similar wording as that of the latest IETF RTCWeb group's charter.
>>>
>>>  (Note the diff tool loses itself near the end: only the decision policy section has been changed)
>>>
>>>  I stayed silent on the relation with WHATWG, and also did not introduce any change in the charter to address Stefan's detailed comments (e.g. "There must be support for media format negotiation and selection in the solution") to leave that as discussion for the group.
>>>
>>>  Could you review the changes and let me know whether that looks good for you?
>>>  I've read the BoF notes taken by Christer Holmberg. Any other input from the IETF BoF meeting that would trigger additional changes in the charter?
>>>
>>>  If you're fine with the changes, I'll get back to reviewers to get their approval, and to W3C Management with a disposition of comments to have them approve the charter and the WG chairs. Depending on the time it take to get reviewers approval, the decision could be taken this week, next week or the week after that (on Wednesday, each time). The group's creation can be officially announced shortly after that.
>>>
>>>  Do you have a timeline for the creation of the IETF group? Having both groups created at the same time might be good if that's not too much of a pain to do.
>>>
>>>  Dan Burnett proposed himself as co-chair for the Web RTC group. Dan has a good experience of W3C groups and is already chair of the Voice Browser working group and of the HTML Speech Incubator Group. On the minus side, he already has quite a few W3C activities on his plate. I do not know well Dan and Stefan. It doesn't make sense to have 3 chairs for the group. Do you have a strong preference?
>>>
>>>  Who would be the chairs of the IETF working group?
>>>
>>>  Thanks,
>>>  Francois.
>>>
>>
>>