IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Fri, 15 November 2013 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EF911E81A5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:38:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.262
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.262 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.987, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eIb1cKDE7OMM for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:38:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836DA11E81B3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:38:10 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f1c8e000005ceb-81-52864df0ba08
Received: from ESESSHC022.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 92.3E.23787.0FD46825; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:38:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:38:08 +0100
Message-ID: <52864DEE.9000506@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:38:06 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <5283DFDC.4010906@ericsson.com> <5e5c891jdb3sam85hb1485ru3r5hj0pclg@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <CAGgHUiRW=1MLNs+z-2CgMXJgeqZkpZuNQxWMzJphO2h9yKHbwg@mail.gmail.com> <528626F7.1050101@bbs.darktech.org> <52862E34.50309@ericsson.com> <528640FC.9010905@bbs.darktech.org>
In-Reply-To: <528640FC.9010905@bbs.darktech.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpiluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3VveDb1uQweOTphZnbv5nt1j7r53d gcnjyYTp7B5LlvxkCmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mr4+PcVe8FDnor2SQuYGhhbuboYOTgkBEwk 5j6v62LkBDLFJC7cW8/WxcjFISRwiFHi1f6HUM5yRoljMxczgVTxCmhL/Pl2mhnEZhFQlfg3 /zAriM0mYCFx80cjG4gtKhAscf7VYnaIekGJkzOfsIAsExEwl3h0txLEFBawlLhw3ARi/BQm ic37N4G1cgoYSCy7v5AZ4jZxiZ7GIJAws4CexJSrLYwQtrxE89bZYBcIAV3T0NTBOoFRcBaS ZbOQtMxC0rKAkXkVI3tuYmZOernhJkZgOB7c8lt3B+OpcyKHGKU5WJTEeT+8dQ4SEkhPLEnN Tk0tSC2KLyrNSS0+xMjEwSnVwMhg2Jw8n6/vOue640dMOsJ2fRXTNu9S+eCzZZeKcm6YZ3hE nzb3yme8N4vV1QS2RnF+sOvS9+Vq5nKq2m+gZaidK8alOrUq+9uaNTUdW9b/7J558+myLcJH t57QqbgQzZ5ZY6lmVHBhYZiFyf6JkeJtYXunBC8R3vf4QfOes0FHlqyqT1meq8RSnJFoqMVc VJwIAKIg7yQVAgAA
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codec selection - way forward
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:38:33 -0000

On 2013-11-15 16:42, cowwoc wrote:
> Magnus,
> 
> In light of Harald and your responses, I'm in favor of two separate
> options for H.261 and Theora respectively. If we find a narrow those
> options down to one within the next two weeks, great, but otherwise I'd
> list them as separate options.
> 
> Also, how would the "voting" work exactly? I was imagining the following
> mechanism:
> 
>   * Each person is given the 10 or so options we'll end up with in 2 weeks.
>   * The person throws out all options they don't consider acceptable
>     under any circumstances
>   * They sort the remaining options in order of preference
>   * We tabulate the results across everyone, assigning a decreasing
>     number of points to the options as the priority decreases (meaning,
>     1st choice gets the most points, 2nd choice less, and so on)
>   * We publish the results, how many "points" each option had and if
>     there is a huge margin for the top one, it wins.
> 

We chairs are working on a proposal for a process for the selection for
the WG to review and do a consensus call on to use. We hope to have
something next week.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email