Re: [rtcweb] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-10

[Sean Turner <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for helping us get done!

spt

> On Oct 9, 2018, at 23:44, Suhas Nandakumar <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi All
> 
>  We just submitted version -11 that address the following
> 
> 1. Magnus Review Comments
> 2. Move from RFC5245 to RFC8445 and ice-sip-sdp for ICE attributes
> 3. Added an ice2 example
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions
> 
> Thanks
> Suhas/Cullen
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 12:15 PM Christer Holmberg <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks! 😊
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> Christer
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Cullen Jennings <[e-mail]>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 6, 2018 4:43 AM
>> *To:* Christer Holmberg
>> *Cc:* Ted Hardie; Adam Roach; RTCWeb IETF; IESG Secretary;
>> [e-mail]; Sean Turner
>> *Subject:* Re: [rtcweb] Publication has been requested for
>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-10
>> 
>> 
>> Christer,
>> 
>> Just as FYI … Suhas and I are working on a PR for sdp draft that moves the
>> examples to be consistent with ice2.
>> 
>> Cullen
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 5, 2018, at 7:00 PM, Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We can as long as we identify that we have outstanding issues in the
>> Shepherd write-up (it does) and the AD is willing (I believe he is or we
>> will shortly find out that he is not).  Note that I also asked Magnus if he
>> was okay with us dealing with his comments along with the other IETF LC
>> comments and he was.
>>> 
>>> spt
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 5, 2018, at 16:24, Christer Holmberg <
>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I am just wondering why we are making publication request when we know
>> changes are still needed.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Christer
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: Sean Turner <[e-mail]>
>>>> Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 1:43 AM
>>>> To: Christer Holmberg
>>>> Cc: Ted Hardie; Adam Roach; [e-mail]; IESG Secretary;
>> [e-mail]
>>>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Publication has been requested for
>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp-10
>>>> 
>>>> Yes and whole lot more drafts:
>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C238
>> [C238] » RFC Editor <https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C238>
>> www.rfc-editor.org
>> 2014-12-12 | draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-09.txt | MISSREF*R(1G) REF