Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-08.txt

Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Fri, 11 April 2014 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A0A1A00EF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 23:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.823
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.823 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FxThB88nzvDU for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 23:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654FC1A00D1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 23:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.103] (p54818011.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.129.128.17]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809FA1C104301; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 08:58:14 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <534686AA.9040304@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 08:58:11 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CB98B7CA-6939-4BB3-8D2D-80922E271CAE@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <20140409100258.9712.74771.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F09BCD44-1060-4DCB-A796-7A31F1C634DE@csperkins.org> <A05F0177-568C-4B19-AD48-9F415A4C008B@lurchi.franken.de> <02F2BCF4-70B5-47A4-ACE6-C0CCCAB11A50@csperkins.org> <9889BAD9-D9A7-42F2-A0DC-632C26696345@lurchi.franken.de> <73C21E05-E36C-4899-98A4-9D762B75FCE4@csperkins.org> <534686AA.9040304@alvestrand.no>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/8qo7LqFxPwqQxY1ZD6Q5jJgyIQ4
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-08.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 06:58:21 -0000

On 10 Apr 2014, at 13:55, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> On 04/09/2014 04:39 PM, Colin Perkins wrote:
>> On 9 Apr 2014, at 15:33, Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
>>> On 09 Apr 2014, at 16:25, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote:
>>>> On 9 Apr 2014, at 15:20, Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
>>>>> On 09 Apr 2014, at 13:00, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On 9 Apr 2014, at 11:02, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>>>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>>>>>> This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers Working Group of the IETF.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    Title           : WebRTC Data Channels
>>>>>>>    Authors         : Randell Jesup
>>>>>>>                      Salvatore Loreto
>>>>>>>                      Michael Tuexen
>>>>>>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-08.txt
>>>>>>> 	Pages           : 15
>>>>>>> 	Date            : 2014-04-09
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Abstract:
>>>>>>> The Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group is charged
>>>>>>> to provide protocol support for direct interactive rich communication
>>>>>>> using audio, video, and data between two peers' web-browsers.  This
>>>>>>> document specifies the non-(S)RTP media data transport aspects of the
>>>>>>> WebRTC framework.  It provides an architectural overview of how the
>>>>>>> Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) is used in the WebRTC
>>>>>>> context as a generic transport service allowing WEB-browsers to
>>>>>>> exchange generic data from peer to peer.
>>>>>> This talks about “(S)RTP” throughout, but the rtp-usage draft requires that SRTP be used for WebRTC, and disallows plain RTP. I think this draft could be simplified by changing “(S)RTP” to “SRTP” throughout.
>>>>> Hi Colin,
>>>>> 
>>>>> The (S)RTP notion goes back to a comment from Magnus. If I remember it correctly he considers SRTP a profile of RTP. Since I don’t wanted to just use RTP, I ended up with (S)RTP based on a discussion with Magnus.
>>>>> 
>>>>> However, I’m fine with changing it to SRTP...
>>>> SRTP is an RTP profile. My comment was that if this is for WebRTC only, then  only SRTP can be used, and not plain RTP. Using “(S)RTP” rather than “SRTP” in this draft suggests that the secure profile is optional, which isn’t the case in WebRTC. If this is for more general use than WebRTC, then “(S)RTP” is fine.
>>> It is clear that in WebRTC only SRTP is used...
>> I don’t believe your draft is clear on that, due to the use of “(S)RTP” terminology. That’s why I commented.
>> 
> Enforcing the SRTP-only rule for WebRTC is not the business of this draft, so it's not a normative statement in any way, shape or form.
> 
> If it's possible to use these channels outside of WebRTC, and some of these places claim to be able to use pure RTP with appropriate security, then making use of "SRTP" only in this draft is confusing.
> 
> I see arguments both ways, and want to leave it at editors' discretion.
At least I don't have a strong position. So will edit the document as it is decided by
the WG... (the current version in git uses SRTP, but I'm willing to change that back)
Maybe my co-editors do have a strong position?

Best regards
Michael
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>