Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-18: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 05 March 2019 04:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E342130F4F; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:49:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZPJj2azxXXo8; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:49:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 159CD130F4D; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:49:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bens-macbook.lan (cpe-66-25-20-105.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.20.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x254mx8C098561 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 4 Mar 2019 22:49:01 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1551761342; bh=N2u9utvzYr7oa9dXdF+37T/9kaQs/u21u7NvzSVLzUo=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=Rr4DOpcTAvIyTRbXT5bTBI3R6S1mO8SOwEpSvr89K7grzVnrebA0EoDiuHri8jggJ Sgfhv6Ric1DUAx4QMhDrmlJKDr5M5uT13iI4CwFcEpDKPnLKRzmD3agJ4qYw4xY3wI gtvMQfJyNbXpreqmtLC4Qif+4fUFAGwKpTh84dUQ=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-20-105.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.20.105] claimed to be bens-macbook.lan
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <84B447CF-0662-4CD3-B92E-AC14321B822B@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AD065F97-0DBF-4E79-9B85-1DB8DFE8510D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 22:48:53 -0600
In-Reply-To: <5513d875-4dc0-8f3f-086e-85a4b2ee5d6c@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch@ietf.org
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
References: <155176110055.5301.9102355161357963697.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5513d875-4dc0-8f3f-086e-85a4b2ee5d6c@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/93wWKezndWYXTC5OAxv7xS3xQSk>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 04:49:05 -0000

Yep, ignore my ignoring. I knew something was wrong; I just confused myself :-)

I can see why we keep messing this up, it’s nigh impossible to keep the order in my head more than a few minutes.

> On Mar 4, 2019, at 10:46 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>; wrote:
> 
> On 3/4/19 10:45 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> Update: Ignore my comment about t= vs c=0. I had my order crossed; it is
>> correct in the example.
> 
> 
> This is true; however, t= versus a= is, indeed, backwards.
> 
> /a
>