Re: [rtcweb] Default candidate pool size

I think the JS app needs a way to say what it needs in the way of pool size. 

On May 12, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11 May 2014 17:18, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>> 
>> My personal opinion is that candidate pooling is useful here and we
>> should probably leave the default in the hands of the browser. I
>> could live with 0 however.
> 
> I tend to agree.  The selection of a default seems like a good
> opportunity for browsers to optimize.  For instance, a mobile device
> might choose to defer gathering until it knows that it needs them;
> whereas a device with a good source of power might prefer the latency
> benefits associated with early gathering.  No point in us specifying
> this.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 