IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser RTC trapezoid)

"Ravindran Parthasarathi" <pravindran@sonusnet.com> Thu, 20 October 2011 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE3A11E80BB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.776
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.776 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.177, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E46h74MgJzcl for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ma01.sonusnet.com (sonussf2.sonusnet.com [208.45.178.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DCC11E80AF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonusmail04.sonusnet.com (sonusmail04.sonusnet.com [10.128.32.98]) by sonuspps2.sonusnet.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9K0Nsxr004272; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:23:54 -0400
Received: from sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com ([10.70.51.30]) by sonusmail04.sonusnet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:23:19 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:53:12 +0530
Message-ID: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159AAB@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <6klu975sd3ufnvcatafpl25ggco7muilac@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser RTC trapezoid)
Thread-Index: AcyOumAE9nxZdE0dTkCE0uSNW4qa5QAA+qFg
References: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159A20@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <CALiegfk+Ezaz2Y4kFkooSozJsDyZZWxqdpX=fec==PYzBHm-bw@mail.gmail.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159AA6@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <23CC8E74-8C17-4484-998B-2A7B66358B81@ag-projects.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159AA7@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <3C2140FA-B177-4D62-B778-5297DCC30A10@ag-projects.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51159AA8@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <6klu975sd3ufnvcatafpl25ggco7muilac@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
From: Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Oct 2011 00:23:19.0511 (UTC) FILETIME=[78002E70:01CC8EBE]
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser RTC trapezoid)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:23:22 -0000

The reported issue is that "the message is not complete enough to establish context" and also, the reply is irrelevant to the original mail discussion. Please see the following mail thread for details:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg02129.html 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg02130.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg02131.html

Thanks
Partha

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net]
>Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 5:24 AM
>To: Ravindran Parthasarathi
>Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-02 (Browser
>RTC trapezoid)
>
>* Ravindran Parthasarathi wrote:
>>I guess that you didn't get my point. In case you remove the earlier
>>mail thread and reply inline to my last reply, the context of my reply
>>is lost, we start discuss something which is not relevant to the
>>original mail.
>>
>>BTW, Please note that it is nothing to do with my e-mail client or its
>>settings.
>
>According to the Netiquette Guidelines in RFC 1855 you should quote just
>enough of the message to establish context but not the whole message. It
>also says that follow-up content should exceed what is quoted, and that
>the quoted text should appear at the top, not bottom, of your response,
>and it says lines should not exceed a low number of characters. You are
>violating all these guidelines. The solution to your thread problem is
>to use a mail client that lets you read the parent of a message easily.
>A common solution is to let the client render the whole thread as tree
>that you can navigate. I do not recall ever seeing someone who used the
>correct posting style for a couple of years to suddenly switch to a very
>different posting style; I doubt there is a point in asking anybody to.
>--
>Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
>Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
>25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email