Re: [rtcweb] e= lines (Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions ..)

"Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Thu, 18 July 2013 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6B111E8182 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 08:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.958
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.958 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.360, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3u0d7ynce35V for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 08:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (mail-db9lp0250.outbound.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5E521F8EE6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 08:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail49-db9-R.bigfish.com (10.174.16.242) by DB9EHSOBE013.bigfish.com (10.174.14.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:06:52 +0000
Received: from mail49-db9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail49-db9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924EA3C01F7; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:06:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:autodiscover.service.exchange.microsoft.com; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -24
X-BigFish: VS-24(zzbb2dI98dI9371I148cIc85dhzz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1033IL18c673h1de097h1de096h8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1b0ah1bceh1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail49-db9: domain of skype.net designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=matthew.kaufman@skype.net; helo=TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail49-db9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail49-db9 (MessageSwitch) id 1374160010545913_16689; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:06:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB9EHSMHS019.bigfish.com (unknown [10.174.16.254]) by mail49-db9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769AD20048; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:06:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by DB9EHSMHS019.bigfish.com (10.174.14.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:06:49 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.2.194]) by TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.86.9]) with mapi id 14.03.0136.001; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:06:47 +0000
From: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] e= lines (Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions ..)
Thread-Index: AQHOg3H6C1QS7WP740Kwrfdnz1pKNZlqiHAAgAABWc0=
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:06:46 +0000
Message-ID: <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484237147CB@TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <CAJrXDUGMohpBdi-ft-o_uE7ewFkw7wRY9x7gYEncjov7qi-Bew@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPa4wBS8pYq=0wesMOfL6TkeC7QGAZ8pWwOcnkhkJqWfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFxo8P8wxh8jX3019yPQOuwQ0eVdsFmRXsbWdWinnc5oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTKpmFC34waqZ4kA-P8t+E6yY9gX1JFCHhsBH0+CF-Qw@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30BC0F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxtKLMf_d=8GSMrqfNhDHPe9MFP2ZTKzZHFn9CyMr-gSVQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30C833@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxvGfkgRp6tXwbOu_kVteHiBBqsyR5ixH18FMKjCNGO8VQ@mail.gmail.com> <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C30CD1E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <BLU401-EAS386F88B3FE140492B39B59693610@phx.gbl> <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484213E41E7@TK5EX14MBXC265.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <51E77362.7070801@alvestrand.no>, <CAJrXDUH=54Sgr8p_W1d_U43x2tt-dr2SqM2+AnWf9ntf_wsN7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJrXDUH=54Sgr8p_W1d_U43x2tt-dr2SqM2+AnWf9ntf_wsN7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.37]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484237147CBTK5EX14MBXC266r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: skype.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] e= lines (Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions ..)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 15:07:46 -0000

By waiting, I reduced what would have been 30 or 40 messages to "only" 12. Just pretend that I spaced them out over the course of the discussion and be happy.

Matthew Kaufman

________________________________
From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Peter Thatcher [pthatcher@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:01 AM
To: Harald Alvestrand
Cc: <rtcweb@ietf.org>;
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] e= lines (Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions ..)

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no<mailto:harald@alvestrand.no>> wrote:
Matthew, thanks for sending 12 messages in 3 hours to the mailing list.


Given how many active threads and subthreads are going on at once, 12 messages doesn't seem like that many.  I've lost track of how many centithreads there are now.


Just one point on which I corrected you before, but since I see you're
repeating it:

On 07/17/2013 11:58 PM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) wrote:
> - What if someone adds an r= or p= or e=?

The code for handling an e= line has been in Chrome since a very early
release.
You claimed in Lyon that you'd tested it and failed to have it parse,
but I never saw the test case; you may have inserted it into the wrong
place, rendering the SDP invalid.

The SDP specification is quite strict about the order of these fields,
exactly to make it simpler to write parsers.

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org<mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb