IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 14 January 2014 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990571AE230 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:52:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sanvUrcIla6z for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:52:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C151AE18B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:52:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l18so1008443wgh.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:52:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DrYMFHnnsZip6+o+ifxNsRAebaaqvbThD7QQX7qZ4vo=; b=KPPzpH3ZM2AmEavG4liNaVKSfxSeF5qCFcqtV/ItZX89xryKd0lvKXpxaTwWNIZeVW Pa6vuCV6giLA2TIvsUv+p0xqyrPBPwkrTC/KVE9hkX44zDiht9xbYBJeNYxlbJRcph+W TBbAQ20sKWw2nFgpKz8asYp5ACtZPgkbHAUJgO8n4RVYEPH7/Nvwd/kj06xk1mEdvgnv HXYEl8rY7SbTAOkZS7US+NSQ6rWOmyGgxSpjpPTo3gNSVIaQRWVkghGJoet8snUsqrBf xD5OBJBogAoLV5QvtdDhRpwauSZwlqkv7FXSp9kLNrFuQGlGV6WXv/wCO9HR9R4MYN6s 1IkA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.106.200 with SMTP id gw8mr5124247wib.50.1389736340037; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.105.132 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:52:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <761C01D0-71A5-46CE-B641-FBB7450DB698@phonefromhere.com>
References: <CABcZeBNx5wpKDgd6TgA9U3_nxEKXdCsXpo8Kp663yQ6e_iN9vQ@mail.gmail.com> <20131215075757.GB3245@audi.shelbyville.oz> <52AE54F8.5070300@bbs.darktech.org> <CABcZeBNqE25O+BNLboXDrJ1ypp26uRAw8ehwtyor9gJccpuzGw@mail.gmail.com> <52AE759C.7020209@bbs.darktech.org> <CABcZeBMjTGs41t7y=xvaLdn4i63HxC2YQUkrd-itq=VkuKvpTA@mail.gmail.com> <52AE9129.8090702@bbs.darktech.org> <CABcZeBPOxqa2YQxOrTp9sVF-tQrpg-Kn=CbazBXOx_9dajhUZA@mail.gmail.com> <52AE9E0C.9060707@bbs.darktech.org> <20131216170820.GD82971@verdi> <20131220113631.GA70585@verdi> <52B47196.6060400@bbs.darktech.org> <D5B39658-5766-4C5B-9090-8E8EDC4BCFA6@apple.com> <52B484AB.5020102@bbs.darktech.org> <CAOJ7v-0QcMsZ+nxG+kP99zE-+VUiFesGh05agwsnmaMCapJSmA@mail.gmail.com> <52B4B85F.2070209@dcrocker.net> <CAOJ7v-21zRcW=mRdec+92qNikUFZNi_UqHqvFpOfC7-MAjvY=w@mail.gmail.com> <52B73B81.6050400@dcrocker.net> <CABcZeBM8P==y_tXrNp-Rxe5unXyJJatY-ONbhCfkGPwi0bCQBg@mail.gmail.com> <761C01D0-71A5-46CE-B641-FBB7450DB698@phonefromhere.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:52:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWzqro4_vWf88iRbScmvNJLmLVjOi3FBsMp4qaaa11o+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: tim panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:52:33 -0000

On 23 December 2013 03:40, tim panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> wrote:
> - We need to leave these decisions to app developers and not assume anything
> we don’t absolutely have to.

It's not that simple.  Who gets the blame when the experience sucks?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email