IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10: (with COMMENT)

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 18 April 2016 05:44 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD0112D099; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 22:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qUxAMvzf5ud2; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 22:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71DA412D0EB; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 22:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6F57C43F0; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 07:44:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VFrHxgB6bCCT; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 07:44:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hta-hippo.lul.corp.google.com (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:1043:12:4dbe:631f:43e:d0c4]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 023B47C0625; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 07:44:21 +0200 (CEST)
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20160415125624.15172.9206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Message-ID: <57147435.1040400@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 07:44:21 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160415125624.15172.9206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/9yRUk3gxpZSbCu05wtGmCCwzHKw>
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio@ietf.org, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 05:44:27 -0000

On 04/15/2016 02:56 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In Section 5: AEC is a SHOULD implement with no reference. Is this well
> understood to be implementable without any reference?

I believe the concept of AEC (echo cancellation) is sufficiently well
understood that it can be implemented without a reference.

Specific echo cancellation algorithms are typically quite fluid and/or
proprietary; I do not believe that the Internet would benefit from
referencing any single AEC algorithm.
Two endpoints do not need to agree on an AEC algorithm to function.

>
> In section 8: acronym VBR is used for the first time without explanation.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.20.0 | Report a Bug | By Email