Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E954E21F9A93 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9Oakuy0fNsS for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1797821F9BAC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e11so6720417wgh.30 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=vs4ZF26a+0TyKavkmhcR+0w4IrwGiriAqLUyf/jBWT0=; b=Ql451JzInfRBYjoXhCnIGaUMnqB8abD0li3nDNruJ7sk2GPcXNCu70JRU/74xT+NfC XZcxa28ZFqkvVzEhKrxh58/VkoOmyB26x0Nac79Kb2XbgGqlDNy1+AcFoqufhFWcewhe wetY5VNdEC7NnUty6A8bkiIHNIxGlZ8itjVS0mL+jdQSECEsFCzGShm6bO1EIUP0b3CV uyVhvjrRMu91pZvD1BKPqJb22he5l09yE2+IVqDwvz4grC7/qS62i9BwLEt3DUlUCnNF bwnIaMWu0WCo/fkYa53FQi615u1eRcxUNEDkStHHIII6XsXs5Y36Mkxt0xvPAufhUogX jGCw==
X-Received: by 10.180.183.104 with SMTP id el8mr3197571wic.43.1371830501247; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ft10sm8160284wib.7.2013.06.21.09.01.40 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id ey16so854274wid.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.185.133 with SMTP id fc5mr3261112wic.8.1371830499562; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.221.202 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF115D4A59@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <CALiegfkajJPxWZTzjYssP91VW+StStLpxoxGCkjOLKDMUWc0rA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWfV=5xBaRqAddqUURThs9J4T4+0HK4Ux07VA51r5oC3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJrXDUFNGKvWHw-yqeApEdTeuqMNPTDxvdKZ2DuzANmcR2y2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3AE500@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAJrXDUHCkQSLab2UuY_vWP3Gr8uh+++c9mDq5f4sCpuaK5aeLQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C1B907.8060508@hookflash.com> <CAJrXDUG06jvPvhfNwZ6Puzxj7E4XxELG_fU=S7B_c=tnC9eoNQ@mail.gmail.com> <78192824-A516-4376-8D4F-3B052ED47A0C@matthew.at> <CAJrXDUGOYc_Z_qWD7J0ZzVdfwYOacH_p5PjZEg5aP1LUetffMA@mail.gmail.com> <51C1F2E9.20405@hookflash.com> <51C1F5ED.9090308@matthew.at> <51C20FAA.4050701@hookflash.com> <CABkgnnWw9anT+h_hnF14nBChS73qpTb31hSM=p2KnGrcRPGRJA@mail.gmail.com> <51C3209B.1030501@alvestrand.no> <CALiegfkEpwxNZL8TU0ofCzRB_Gza+NoSnZpGcM=tuYBOXmHsZQ@mail.gmail.com> <51C335F9.4000900@alvestrand.no> <CALiegfk_wwvdSixFYWpBBdUNfXxmcOwCnRsjyS6J3M9WG_dJCg@mail.gmail.com> <51C38356.3020402@jitsi.org> <CALiegfm1xYpAnmrg=4vx_06RZQTo_RS2nFJoidpoQtjg2kn=Vw@mail.gmail.com> <1371807600.23131.YahooMailNeo@web171301.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <CALiegfmPV=E2qh_E-v_eBiSj9iK7Un2JLDtELF7xnYARHy5B3g@mail.gmail.com> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF115D4A59@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:01:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtYeDP-O_YfT3G=+mHPfPKAthJVuoYtNaa3R97yFU-ZoA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c355fe9e5a9b04dfac2d24
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZ9bLqGKDdkZq3zRKQ5JWeA1f8V/vV84p9KVLoBOp+uKL7BKKdEdvhhdoXJxOcz/TTaWpt
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "diopmamadou@doubango.org" <diopmamadou@doubango.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requesting "SDP or not SDP" debate to be re-opened
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:01:45 -0000

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Hutton, Andrew <
andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>; wrote:

>
> Which means we have not been as unsuccessful as people seem to think.
>

If building a demo or a high school home work is your goal, then yes. If
you want the commercial product then no. I am not sure if you are familiar
with 80/20 rule, but normally 20% of features require 80% of time to
implement. In case of WebRTC it is 20% of features require 99% to
implement. In other words, you get something working quick, but getting it
to complete product take an inordinate amount of work.
_____________
Roman Shpount