IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec?

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 27 November 2013 13:13 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FA71AE197 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 05:13:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jov_ck-dHnNh for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 05:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1001AD943 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 05:13:25 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7eff8e000000eda-03-5295eff46bc8
Received: from ESESSHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F3.55.03802.4FFE5925; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:13:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:13:24 +0100
Message-ID: <5295EFF3.9050303@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:13:23 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0EE419@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0EE419@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpiluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3VvfL+6lBBhcvqVs8bTzLaLH2Xzu7 A5NH67O9rB5LlvxkCmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MpY/e8wS8FJoYp5By6wNTB28XcxcnJICJhI zP67hB3CFpO4cG89WxcjF4eQwCFGieNrPkM5yxklDj6exARSxSugLXF2Zz9LFyMHB4uAqsT9 OUkgYTYBC4mbPxrZQGxRgWCJq73rmCHKBSVOznzCAmKLCCRJHPzVzQpiCwtYSiy6vhisXkgg SmLvtONMICM5BaIl1h7lAzElBMQlehqDQCqYBfQkplxtYYSw5SWat85mhujUlmho6mCdwCg4 C8myWUhaZiFpWcDIvIqRPTcxMye93GgTIzAcD275rbqD8c45kUOM0hwsSuK8H946BwkJpCeW pGanphakFsUXleakFh9iZOLglGpgFOl/0JCw3fTZsZsKUYUnZ++Uklyy8kH6LM+HG5YLxHmL r7DlUl9cPSO2pk8sv3XOAs+NFSfruc9qnBL3sJDO1GFzDzXOLZ/zYnfVNCaRo+sPlnY3PLG0 EIucItP7+RJzS3vj289Mn1nOGL56+/ne4Yrd+94vjtk4yXfTymV/70/YaLQv79dnUSWW4oxE Qy3mouJEAEWs6h0VAgAA
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:13:29 -0000

Keith,

I think this really goes back to the BOF and ad-hoc meeting during IETF
80 and the chartering, considering our charter do contain the following
text:

6. Define a set of media formats that must or should be supported by
a client to improve interoperability.

Unfortunately the minutes for IETF 80 Adhoc simply mentions codec
discussion but no details.

Also Harald's email moving the discussion to the WG mailing list (8th of
April 2011), includes a immediate jump to how do we achieve a MTI,
rather any discussion if this is something that needs to be established.

I am quite certain that this consensus was something the WG was created
with. And all mentions in email or slides that I have looked includes
this assumption. Including the Video Codec discussion in Paris. Look at
slide 3 where the slides states that we have consensus on the need for MTI.
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-rtcweb-5.pdf
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/minutes/minutes-83-rtcweb.txt

Cheers

Magnus

On 2013-11-27 11:25, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
> A reminder that I have not had any response to this mail.
> 
> It would be nice if someone cound direct me to the right place.
> 
> Keith 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) 
>> Sent: 08 November 2013 02:57
>> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
>> Subject: Mandatory to implement video codec?
>>
>> References have been made to a prior consensus decision to 
>> have a mandatory to implement video codec.
>>
>> I'd like to refresh myself on those discussions and am having 
>> difficulty finding them.
>>
>> Can someone remember when they occurred and therefore point 
>> me in the right direction?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Keith
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email