Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....

Mohammed Raad <mohammedsraad@raadtech.com> Tue, 09 December 2014 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mohammedsraad@raadtech.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE1E1A6EDE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:31:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xI4eyDevk8hR for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E61F41A87BC for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id n3so2863776wiv.13 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:31:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zPJbHaMatrqFtaPOjNAMPdoNVPCXUPQ8fWP7mI6cNTY=; b=MSuLhjTyum4vvyC/iWFNBmY2LNouwvnigW2sl7ZttRy/ZrrvxgKFPWgc0NlMoCOKCS FVfKTW0W5x+3e6NhCEMHmbE3qx1UBk0nnQB/62QPqi+cR8TROhQjy9ItyoyrjEP47sbq eHSos6z+lPVzv7T4xmyhVDhjv8aZXPlDYTGNZPOrxrpfzFuecONpSmFYxaNuIdw5ViqS JopJAOihxapaB2VTeXCWLLrdW0apoXfU/CkXo8UTjZZD0yGsggMSlncW0PbWb1+ZcDGI p4quLQG/1g/K11FRX/qjMONU8VheILnuw8L7JiuG1TniGWFvIBMDd9fcvVf7NwbAPFpx qtbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmNx5cURzMNHUFFCgPAWRPBd3kKWcbmNSbK0hII8WvBJ+cZvgPGeFBgxd5sfoYQD5VcMmo8
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.195.11.6 with SMTP id ee6mr7670178wjd.95.1418153494641; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:31:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.6.39 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:31:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.6.39 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:31:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com>
References: <5486C48D.8040602@alvestrand.no> <F092E8C6-380C-4B20-B71F-449162617BC5@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:31:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+E6M0mfHomZByk0h1Fdxis3Q+Z0cOPve+qWqq_BVOtq9qB6sg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mohammed Raad <mohammedsraad@raadtech.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bae4666491cd70509cd978a
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/A4Gxb4irWaZAWAoPrLCnEb9BmHs
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Video codecs: Clear positions....
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:31:42 -0000

You know, that's a very strange path to take. I mean it really does sound
like attempting to come to an agreement regarding what features future
products should have by limiting participation in this technical decision
process to those committed to deploy specific technologies. I think you
ought to read the definition of anti competitive practice again.

Mohammed
On 9 Dec 2014 19:32, "David Singer" <singer@apple.com> wrote:

>
> > On Dec 9, 2014, at 1:44 , Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
> wrote:
> >
> > I note that the "confirming sense of the room" thread has gotten a lot
> > of messages that are not declaring a position on the question.
> >
> > I also note that from the messages on the thread, I can't figure out if
> > Keith Drage, Gili, Monty Montgomery or Peter Saint-Andre have taken a
> > position (I could guess, but I don't want to - besides, they might not
> > want to take a position, which is perfectly OK).
> >
> > It would be nice for me as a reader if people could:
> >
> > - state their position on the "confirming sense of the room" thread
> > - change the subject line when they want to say anything else
> >
> > That's my preference - of course, people who have "mute thread" in their
> > email readers might want the whole discussion to stay on thread, and
> > will hate me for the last suggestion....
> >
> > Harald
>
> Thanks, Harald, that would help.
>
> I would also like to know from those confirming the sense of the room,
> whether THEY THEMSELVES intend to implement both codecs, or whether they
> conveniently think they don’t need to, and it’s just a problem for other
> people to handle.
>
> Honestly, a +1 for “those other people should do it” is meaningless.
>
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>