Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp - Christer's review

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 02 August 2018 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66DB130DDD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DVCJ7TSAK6g for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD106130E29 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=ericsson.com; s=mailgw201801; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@ericsson.com; t=1533245131; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UiX4rmjLhJ3KoQkCDSBjEYg2Kjc3nopLPwk751zT5/E=; b=YuU0OPyLCkc2lPqqcgYFxuHHQYvAyWt4cYV9MM8jRprBNJuknYvADHB1QwwVhhCK z2cmRMSMlLF4yAauNweZ3PrZNnTsHIOuPoTzm6ZW1gLM2eWFyxeh+XufSO058t3z TYxSOsu96VMnVz3V/E0Ivbvse/8EL5oNFAvVYIdxROw=;
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-1dfff700000059c2-b8-5b6376cb3b1c
Received: from ESESBMB502.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.115]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F8.2A.22978.BC6736B5; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:25:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESBMB503.ericsson.se (153.88.183.170) by ESESBMB502.ericsson.se (153.88.183.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:25:31 +0200
Received: from ESESBMB503.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.186]) by ESESBMB503.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.186]) with mapi id 15.01.1466.003; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:25:31 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
CC: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp - Christer's review
Thread-Index: AdQlFBFCoeP2SB4qTiyupXfADLWxPgFbxFWAAAkCtaA=
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 21:25:31 +0000
Message-ID: <3027b6d3180a42b89948f3bdbdcb9d2a@ericsson.com>
References: <cd59ef13e9474d9192f8604715252037@ericsson.com> <EC434753-462E-4A0A-919D-3B57C63555FD@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <EC434753-462E-4A0A-919D-3B57C63555FD@sn3rd.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.153]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmphkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbG9WPd0WXK0wao+a4u1/9rZLa6samR2 YPJYsuQnk8fBg4wBTFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGdMO9zAV/GCteH7zK3MD4xPWLkZODgkBE4ld ez6xdzFycQgJHGWUaH3dyArhfGWUuHdpOzOEs5RRYuXhy0AZDg42AQuJ7n/aIN0iAgoSTUcf gE1iFlCU+LJ8PhtIibCAh8SM7ZkQJZ4Sd6YdAguLCFhJtB3iBwmzCKhIbJn1hRnE5hWwlri/ /xoTiC0kkCfxpe8pC4jNKWAr8XbeVLDpjAJiEt9PrWGC2CQucevJfCaI+wUkluw5zwxhi0q8 fPwP6i8lib3HrrOArGUW0JRYv0sf5sgp3Q/ZIdYKSpyc+YRlAqPYLCRTZyF0zELSMQtJxwJG llWMosWpxUm56UZGeqlFmcnFxfl5enmpJZsYgXFzcMtvgx2ML587HmIU4GBU4uE1Kk6OFmJN LCuuzD3EKMHBrCTCOy0eKMSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNafIhRmoNFSZzXwm9zlJBAemJJanZqakFq EUyWiYNTqoFx5qaWzB0FKxzq14t3nHB0eu9qJ3mxy22nwu7HuUecDPtWLrsuMGtSocmFKYuW sHLG8bJcaLpc94hztdXvidFsBsKdIbNOzzghpH5Kr1lJJlH7qmLNXq37KhotK+4/sfk+cUru 5P8HnuadDNdu3Cu3SWPPAdZnLzhc2L3fMzzQq9qeejPXqcBQiaU4I9FQi7moOBEAM9aBgpcC AAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/A7h-KbvfXht4mNJh_xWvKYCrHCc>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp - Christer's review
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 21:25:36 -0000

Hi,

>> Yes, this again brings up the what-ICE-version-to-reference-question. All the other ICE 
>> related drafts in the examples reference (directly or indirectly) RFC 8445.
>
> We (Ted, Cullen, and Sean) consulted with our AD and confirmed that the plan outlined 
> when trying to address this issue in the rtcweb-overview draft is still the plan [0].  tl;dr: 
> figure this out when cluster 238 gets untangled in the RFC editor’s queue.

Correct. Just wanted to point out that this draft might be affected too.

Regards,

Christer