Re: [rtcweb] Basic scenario 'impossible?' to achieve with the actual API

2013/7/2 José Luis Millán <jmillan@aliax.net>

> Thanks Enrico,
>
> Yes, you are right. I was missing a detail.
>
> Now imagine you are not using your own wire protocol but a standard one,
> where accepting the request doesn't imply accepting or rejecting the SDP
> offer, since SDP has its own methods to accept or reject the call as
> commented before.
>

I meant 'accept or reject the SDP offer or part of it'  where is said
'accept or reject the call'

>
> A --{"action":"CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B
> B --{"action":"ACCEPT CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> A
>
> A --{"action":"CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B
> B --{"action":"ACCEPT CALL","sdp":"v=0\r\nm=video 0..."}-> A
>
>
>
> 2013/7/2 Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
>
>> On 7/2/13 6:04 PM, José Luis Millán wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Please, let me know how this normal use case could be solved with the
>> > current API.
>>
>> Just off the top of my head:
>>
>> Audio-only call establishment:
>>
>> A --{"action":"CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B
>> B --{"action":"ACCEPT CALL","sdp":"v=0..."}-> A
>>
>> Rejected audio+video upgrade proposal:
>>
>> A --{"action":"UPGRADE","sdp":"v=0..."}-> B
>> B --{"action":"REJECT UPGRADE"}-> A
>>
>> Alice rolls back and removes local video display.
>>
>> I may be missing something, but doesn't look like rocket science to me...
>>
>> Enrico
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> José Luis Millán
>


-- 
José Luis Millán