Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribute

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Thu, 09 May 2013 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824BE21F9184 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 19:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UGFY5AO4KPqn for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 19:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D149621F8616 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 19:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-171-68-20-68.cisco.com (unknown [171.68.20.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F3FD50A85; Wed, 8 May 2013 22:08:48 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36CDD2@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 19:08:49 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C03A81FC-B2E5-4C6E-92AD-F43CF3A65217@iii.ca>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36CCC8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36CDD2@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Plan A, respun - bundle-only attribute
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 02:08:57 -0000

On May 7, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> One more question, regarding the bundle-only attribute:
> 
> Q3: Assume the answerer supports BUNDLE, and return an SDP answer with identical port numbers, as shown in section 7.1. I guess the second offer will then replace the zero port lines with the actual port value that the offerer uses for the multiplexing?

Yes, I think that would be the best thing to do. It would be consisted with our direction on allowing things looking at the SDP to get the correct port