[rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-15: (with COMMENT)
"Mirja Kuehlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 04 August 2016 13:58 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD43F12B00E; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 06:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160804135822.15952.16587.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 06:58:22 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/APOK8bTTBueqoyHivCJjhb0Xtss>
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org, rtcweb-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports@ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 13:58:23 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for updating! Leaving it to this comment: Based on the TSV review I agree that this document (named "Transports for WebRTC") should say more about congestion control. The TSV reviewer (Thanks Allison!) proposes to refer draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-17 and draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-09. I would even appreciate to have a sentence that says that congestion control and a circuit breaker is mandated in draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-26.
- [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Michael Welzl
- Re: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Michael Welzl
- Re: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Michael Welzl
- Re: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Michael Welzl