IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Wed, 28 September 2011 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECDD11E80D6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.444
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.444 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.232, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nqBiuLcVzsFk for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f50.google.com (mail-pz0-f50.google.com [209.85.210.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A280D11E80D4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so21830784pzk.9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.32.133 with SMTP id j5mr45968930pbi.68.1317227218281; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f50.google.com (mail-pz0-f50.google.com [209.85.210.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u1sm9081523pbr.9.2011.09.28.09.26.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so21830673pzk.9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.34.138 with SMTP id z10mr45299129pbi.105.1317227215950; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.43.229 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfnHABAdwH8TsmLP76AG1BuQL8GHRjd4t9TBTqmh-1Mibg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD5OKxtNjmWBz92bRuxka7e-BUpTPgVUvr3ahJGpmZ-U5nuPbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGSmz5T_F+SK2EoBQm6T-iRKp7dd4j8ZAF5JKdbbyomZQA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmO54HC+g9L_DYn4jtXAAbLEvS++qxKa6TNrLDREs9SeA@mail.gmail.com> <4E80984A.903@skype.net> <CALiegfmyvTb57WVooKryS-ubfcg+w5gZ+zfO1zzBLn3609AzaA@mail.gmail.com> <4E809EE6.2050702@skype.net> <CAD5OKxvUOadaU0dnB7-Ho9cZ92VY+4Owuhj7oKPCx9Jy1iwT1Q@mail.gmail.com> <C2DF2C51-B3F7-443D-A047-7E6FB03E6D20@phonefromhere.com> <CAOJ7v-3AJJcdrCKcH4AJmv_016sZtcOPOo8yCv3Va65eJogAkQ@mail.gmail.com> <53C72381-DC23-4A6A-944C-B418791876B0@cisco.com> <CALiegf=nG+KXto9CXfn64CQSp3P5Lfm+S8c0xnA187Fhz=fcrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnHABAdwH8TsmLP76AG1BuQL8GHRjd4t9TBTqmh-1Mibg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:26:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxuG54Uduc5AwhYE=Q5WrpsrT_zF9yEUkt-ZrCfc-Rbxmw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec52163034b926e04ae02dcbe"
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:24:11 -0000

Inaki,

ICE Lite is defined in RFC 5245 were procedures for lite implementation are
defined side-by-side with regular one.
_____________
Roman Shpount


On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:

> 2011/9/28 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>:
> > Just to add information about ICE Lite:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rescorla-mmusic-ice-lite-00
>
> However such draft is expired. Shouldn't it be considered nowadays in
> which, finally, we see the *real* requirements of ICE?
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.19.0 | Report a Bug | By Email