Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 26 July 2013 18:56 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B9611E812B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.272, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YxQ+ctG7zmVk for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC3011E80F6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f0b6d0000002d5-63-51f2c667e6d6
Received: from ESESSHC002.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 9C.B1.00725.766C2F15; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:56:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.135]) by ESESSHC002.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.24]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:56:39 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts
Thread-Index: AQHOeRk/xEWRvnU2UUyUoui5CoC7yJlWeJoAgCDKU4CAAC6YBA==
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:56:38 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C40AE21@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7A95191A-6488-435E-B491-FEF3A6AC342F@iii.ca> <BLU169-W823344CCF942CC7B75815E937D0@phx.gbl>, <C8F0073F-9B59-4FF8-BC04-5458221634A4@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <C8F0073F-9B59-4FF8-BC04-5458221634A4@iii.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C40AE21ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW76sU+BBk8e6FrsX3KZ2eLD+h+M Fmv/tbM7MHs87jnD5rFkyU8mj8vnPzIGMEdx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZcx+9Jy9YFNGxdl5Wxgb GF9EdDFyckgImEhsm93MAmGLSVy4t56ti5GLQ0jgMKNE55K9rBDOEkaJZx//sHcxcnCwCVhI dP/TBmkQEfCTWNrxhR3EZhZQlTh/6BwjiC0s4CjR3HGADaLGSWLF/CVMMPbEiefB4ixA9Vcu vATr5RXwlTjWuhZq13RGiYbrf8AaOAWsJL6+6QFrYAS67vupNUwQy8Qlbj2ZzwRxtYDEkj3n mSFsUYmXj/+xQtTkS3yc+IgZYoGgxMmZT1gmMIrMQtI+C0nZLCRlEHEdiQW7P7FB2NoSyxa+ Zoaxzxx4zIQsvoCRfRUje25iZk56ueEmRmBEHdzyW3cH46lzIocYpTlYlMR5N+mdCRQSSE8s Sc1OTS1ILYovKs1JLT7EyMTBKdXA2FS8U6ZRfpdtVdaMwoXtpmanN2W5OJWvfhsmv6dLKMAx SETEYt1rz30NrBJi+qeYrlxektzI9zfmsFPzR/sPJX3L9/eUGV+pPGDce+uYu+HuVx8PJc3J Ott93/7mT8uW3VqvLix2Nt8Xtiwob7vvl+p9rX+DBC80/FmwKj9X98H+nir/Mn01JZbijERD Leai4kQA8mo+U3YCAAA=
Cc: "rtcweb_ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:56:46 -0000
Hi Cullen, I may missed something, but it seems a little strange to me when individual drafts, that haven't even been adopted yet, are indicated as 70-80% complete... Some drafts have also expired. Regards, Christer Sent from Windows using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -----Original Message----- From: Cullen Jennings [fluffy@iii.ca] To: Bernard Aboba [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com] CC: rtcweb@ietf.org [rtcweb@ietf.org] Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts Yah, I get your point. I will try and find a way to better represent this on the slides. On Jul 5, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> wrote: > I think you need to take dependencies into account. There are several reasons for this: > > a. Until you've gone through the dependency graph for the items, the full list of documents that need to be tracked isn't known. > b. Estimates of completion are dependent on the progress of normative dependencies (e.g. they can't be published until the dependencies are resolved). > > As an example, draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview (which is listed as 80 percent complete) has normative references to the following drafts: > > [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp] 70 > [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-audio] 50 > [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-data-channel] 70 > [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-jsep] 50 > [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage] 40 > [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-security] 80 > [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-security-arch] 80 > [I-D.nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri] 80 > [I-D.tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps] 70 > > Since draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview is dependent on a document (rtp usage) which only has an estimate of 40 percent done) I'd say that the estimate is probably closer to 40 than 80. > > > > From: fluffy@iii.ca > > Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 17:47:20 -0700 > > To: rtcweb@ietf.org > > Subject: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various drafts > > > > > > As part of putting together some chair slides for Berlin, I'm trying to get a very rough idea of where things are. I'd like to get folks input on what percent done various drafts are where Done is a published RFC. > > > > This is nearly impossible to do at any level of accuracy but I do want to get a vague idea. I took a very rough stab below just to have a starting point to get the conversation going. I'm sure my numbers are mostly wrong but I have tried to ask a few people and sort of take the central cluster of the guess. If you think I am way out, please provide some feedback of what you think the number actually is. > > > > I'm happy to get feedback on specific drafts or feedback of the form they are all too low or too high. I do encourage people to realistically look at the data tracker to see how long other drafts have taken for each stage to get a baseline instead of just going with their gut feel. > > > > Thanks, Cullen > > > > PS - if you are an author and look at the number next to your draft and think it is way off, please please, say something. > > > > > > > > draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview 80 > > draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements 70 > > http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/getusermedia.html 70 > > draft-burnett-rtcweb-constraints-registry 80 > > http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html 50 > > draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri 80 > > draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris 80 > > draft-ietf-rtcweb-security 80 > > draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch 80 > > draft-muthu-behave-consent-freshness-02 50 > > draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel 70 > > draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp 70 > > draft-jesup-rtcweb-data-protocol 50 > > draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps 70 > > draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage 40 > > draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis 80 > > draft-ietf-avtcore-avp-codecs 80 > > draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext 80 > > draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates 70 > > draft-lennox-rtcweb-rtp-media-type-mux 80 > > draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers 70 > > draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-media-rtp-session 70 > > draft-lennox-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream 70 > > draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep 50 > > draft-ietf-mmusic-msid 70 > > draft-rescorla-mmusic-ice-trickle 25 > > draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation 50 > > draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes 25 > > draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos 10 or 90 > > draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio 50 > > draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus 90 > > draft-ietf-payload-vp8-08 95 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rtcweb mailing list > > rtcweb@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Cullen Jennings
- [rtcweb] Question about the status of various dra… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Question about the status of various… Harald Alvestrand