Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we are doing no signs of offering real world interoperability

Alexey Aylarov <alexey@zingaya.com> Mon, 06 August 2012 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey@zingaya.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291E021F85B8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v1cRRI7jeHeG for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o1.email.zingaya.com (o1.email.zingaya.com [50.31.39.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4934D21F85A8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=zingaya.com; h=date :subject:message-id:from:to:cc:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpapi; bh=j0TNKhl3v914buS2SfGHZT jF5Uw=; b=ex0UZtAat/QvbW99reINXtgxxmOHWnkDDH07gPwjzcq7My8SyJjNdT RNSsJqqRiJLXylZiCqDeFyF35As6R6ocGdVdyfYnKQ7MHY8dBX7D90Cj1HKe72Qm 4c1f7VGJ/nCGFy5cmX6qoIN7CQebvi/weE7tF3J3u0eYymAdySypc=
Received: by 10.16.69.112 with SMTP id mf23.17018.501FFB1E3 Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:13:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.zingaya.com (unknown [10.9.180.5]) by mi2 (SG) with ESMTP id 501ffb1e.4517.f7eafe Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:13:02 -0500 (CST)
Received: by mail.zingaya.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 547CF103A004; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:12:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.20.148.46] (mail.zingaya.com [188.138.50.58]) by mail.zingaya.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A4701103A003; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:12:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:11:19 +0400
Message-ID: <pm9g3f539oh0iyg0y0j4elbn.1344273079260@email.android.com>
From: Alexey Aylarov <alexey@zingaya.com>
To: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Sendgrid-EID: 1ZgjKEJRFrScP9jRqx/qmkgw2v3eAagChXzRcreaJSsG3lbHoVkH2/9vIsMLt812Nl4sGNoJElE0AxM8v3E/xhy42UDcP02wkZDIKsPFTx3I77H5h538+IoXT//0ZADmnMV42h3WrMjwfs2Ht2/8SA==
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:27:50 -0700
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org " <rtcweb@ietf.org>, public-webrtc@w3.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Microsoft tells W3C and IETF what we are doing no signs of offering real world interoperability
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:14:57 -0000

It was easy to expect from company which tries to build its own standards all the time instead of team work on open technologies. If they want to live in their own universe - it's their choice. We need to continue team work on the future of open web communications.

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:

>
>I see that Microsoft decided to wait until the W3C and IETF were close to done before putting together a proposal that, if accepted, would explode most the current works and create maximal delay on this work. 
>
>http://blogs.skype.com/en/2012/08/customizable_ubiquitous_real_t.html
>
>
>
>