IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Consensus call regarding media security

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9A521E8049 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00Sa+IDvkIFL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s8.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s8.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C542521E8042 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W80 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s8.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:02:05 -0700
Message-ID: <BLU169-W80FA8377288974CAF4716F93480@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_d5ea533e-84d9-419e-a416-d2373d14ad5b_"
X-Originating-IP: [130.129.23.181]
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, rtcweb@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 23:02:05 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <4F732531.2030208@ericsson.com>
References: <4F732531.2030208@ericsson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Mar 2012 06:02:05.0960 (UTC) FILETIME=[7803E880:01CD0D71]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Consensus call regarding media security
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:02:08 -0000

I agree with proposition #1 (SRTP) unconditionally. 

With respect to proposition #2 (DTLS-SRTP), perhaps the words "with details to be worked out" should have been added.  

I believe that the consensus achieved was only on a general direction, not an endorsement of particular proposals. 

Personally, I would like to have more specifics about the required features of DTLS-SRTP in the RTCWEB context.



> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:50:25 +0200
> From: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: [rtcweb] Consensus call regarding media security
> 
> WG,
> 
> In todays RTCWEB WG meeting there was discussion around media security
> mechanism. In this meeting there was some clear consensus in the
> meeting which we would like to confirm on the list.
> 
> The first was that there was overwhelming consensus that all RTP
> packets SHALL be protected by SRTP.
> 
> Secondly that no one objected against making DTLS-SRTP a mandatory to
> implement and the default keying mechanism. Additional mechanisms are
> not precluded.
> 
> WG participants may state their position regarding these consensus calls
> until 12th of April when the chairs will declare the final consensus. If
> you where present in the meeting room and comment on this, please
> indicate that.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Magnus Westerlund
> For the WG chairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email