IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 15 December 2011 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069D721F8509 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:52:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.971
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.971 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.628, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pBbL0Omj3kTu for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:52:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7380721F84FD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:52:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yenm7 with SMTP id m7so2132142yen.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:52:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ir6NXWpGykoaIQ75tWhD4UK5djcS7aEfzA0ROFZ6v6k=; b=nCflGwCUk7+wYHEVzM6GdxrkuV105zlIisrjFySOn3EGXHmRXj7LZYtjxLOQtgsqC+ qv3jOO1L05gOjktmyN/cqTcagKIueHxNBXIr55Dee4X3a4AEkzmaRJ3P9Qn/dtrWf09e /1fMqF8KAMrG2YBluBgy2fS4MOz8HlRqb9omo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.131.1 with SMTP id l1mr7013893yhi.82.1323978771115; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:52:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.156.40 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:52:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EEA45FD.2070801@mozilla.com>
References: <1240384453.38804.1323904149461.JavaMail.root@zimbra1.shared.sjc1.mozilla.com> <4EEA4067.2030305@sbcglobal.net> <4EEA45FD.2070801@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:52:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAqMSqUyqfNF_rfw2b4UQQxMf7vtCQnFiCN8dUD1qQ1VA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Codec Draft
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:52:52 -0000

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Timothy B. Terriberry
<tterriberry@mozilla.com> wrote:

> What actually matters is, are people willing to ship it?

This is the critical point.  The working group agreed to specify a
mandatory-to-implement here because we want to avoid interoperability
failures.   Defining one that folks won't ship does not achieve that
goal.  It's that simple.


regards,

Ted Hardie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email