Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs

Ron <ron@debian.org> Sat, 01 September 2012 03:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ron@debian.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D0511E80A4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.423
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.423 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oEt3Qt2yHa1j for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D276711E80A3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EACyDQVB5LWvi/2dsb2JhbABFuyCBCIIgAQEFOhwzCxguFBgNN4gMum2LCYNlgxwDiE2FKIdiAZAagnM
Received: from ppp121-45-107-226.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO audi.shelbyville.oz) ([121.45.107.226]) by ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2012 13:13:11 +0930
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2214F8F3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 13:13:10 +0930 (CST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at audi.shelbyville.oz
Received: from audi.shelbyville.oz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (audi.shelbyville.oz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id YEyZjLBuDSjl for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 13:13:09 +0930 (CST)
Received: by audi.shelbyville.oz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4894B4F902; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 13:13:09 +0930 (CST)
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 13:13:09 +0930
From: Ron <ron@debian.org>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120901034309.GG23434@audi.shelbyville.oz>
References: <9E2843EA-EBB9-40B3-898C-6B5216FAE7A5@cisco.com> <CABRok6kSU9RFQo5GEQqtSRi2dTPV3fCN2MERfSQKorH1Hnbh4w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABRok6kSU9RFQo5GEQqtSRi2dTPV3fCN2MERfSQKorH1Hnbh4w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Confirmation of consensus on audio codecs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 03:43:12 -0000

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:46:21PM +0100, Neil Stratford wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
> <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
> > At the last meeting we took a hum on selecting Opus and G.711 as the mediatory to implement audio codecs. If there is any new opinions please send them to the list by August 30th, after which the chairs will make a determination of consensus.
> 
> I support both G.711 and Opus as mandatory to implement.
> 
> G.711 alone does not meet the rtcweb goal of producing a viable
> alternative to browser plugins as it will be impossible for an
> application developer to guarantee an acceptable audio quality
> (defined as at least as good as when using plugins) for browser to
> browser calls.

Indeed.  +1 for Opus and G.711 as MTI.

 Ron